Gravity vs. Grit: The Tactical Pursuit of a Legend's KOM
Overview: Assaulting the Col de Rates
The
Key Strategic Decisions
The strategy hinged on two distinct phases. Plan A utilized a traditional single-file pace line. The goal was to have riders peel off one by one after maximum-intensity pulls, keeping the pace consistently above 32 km/h. When this collapsed due to fitness disparities and poor pacing discipline, the team shifted to Plan B: a staggered lead-out. This required presenters to station themselves at 600-meter intervals up the mountain. By starting from a standstill and accelerating to speed before
Performance Breakdown: The Power Paradox
The execution of Plan B revealed the brutal reality of winter fitness. The team targeted an output of 7 watts per kilo for each 600-meter stint. While theoretically manageable for a minute, the high altitude and unrelenting gradient quickly eroded their capacity.

Critical Moments and Future Implications
The failure of Plan A was the primary turning point; the team unraveled within the first 900 meters because the opening pace exceeded the group's collective threshold. Plan B was tactically superior but suffered from poor measurement of intervals, forcing Feather to bridge gaps solo. This attempt underscores a vital endurance lesson: no amount of tactical drafting can compensate for a deficit in raw power-to-weight ratio when the gradient bites. To beat