United Nations

Beyond the Illusion of Weakness Societal violence is rarely just a failure of strength; it is often a failure of intent. When we look at nations struggling with high homicide rates, gang warfare, or political unrest, the immediate reaction is to label them as weak. We assume these states lack the resources, the training, or the technology to protect their citizens. However, Rachel Kleinfeld challenge this notion in her work, A Savage Order. She reveals that many of the world's most violent democracies are not actually weak. Instead, they are complicit. These are states where the political elite has made a calculated, often implicit deal with violent actors to maintain power. To move toward a more resilient society, we must first confront the psychological and structural barriers that allow violence to take root. This is not just a matter of foreign policy or policing; it is a matter of collective mindset and the intentional rebuilding of trust. When a government decides to prioritize its survival over the safety of its most marginalized citizens, it creates a vacuum that is inevitably filled by organized crime, insurgents, or vigilantes. Understanding this dynamic is the first step in reclaiming a path toward peace and human potential. The Complicit State vs. The Weak State Distinguishing between a state that cannot act and one that chooses not to act is vital. In a truly weak state, like the Wild West of the early 19th-century United States, the infrastructure simply doesn't exist. There are no courts, no nearby jails, and no reliable police force. Violence in these environments is often a logistical byproduct of isolation. When Theodore Roosevelt had to walk his captives for 36 hours through a frozen landscape, he was operating in a weak state. The solution for such a place is straightforward: build capacity, establish courts, and professionalize security. Contrast this with the U.S. South during the Reconstruction era. The South had judges, lawyers, and police. Yet, it remained far more violent for far longer than the Wild West. This was a complicit state. The Democratic Party of that era and the Ku Klux Klan shared a confluence of interest: suppressing the Black vote to regain political control. The state didn't lack the power to stop lynchings; it lacked the will. By granting the Ku Klux Klan impunity, the political leadership used violence as a tool for electoral success. This pattern repeats globally, from Mexico to Nigeria, where politicians trade protection for campaign finance or muscle. The Psychology of the Middle Class Divide Violence thrives in the gaps created by inequality and polarization. In highly unequal societies, the middle class often develops a psychological defense mechanism: rationalization. Because they can afford private security and gated communities, they view violence as something that happens to "other" people—those in the "bad parts of town" or those "involved in the business." This detachment allows the violence to continue for decades. As long as the middle class feels insulated, they rarely demand the radical systemic changes required to fix a complicit state. Furthermore, extreme polarization acts as a smokescreen for corruption. In Italy, the Christian Democratic Party maintained ties with the Mafia for decades. When the Communist Party of Italy pointed this out, the Christian Democrats simply dismissed the claims as propaganda from a Soviet-funded enemy. When we are at each other's throats politically, we stop looking at the facts and start looking at the jersey the messenger is wearing. This blindness is exactly what complicit leaders rely on to maintain their savage order. The Three-Step Framework for Restoration How do these societies break the cycle? It usually starts with a "privilege-violating" event—where violence oversteps its bounds and begins to affect the middle class. This creates a moment of choice. One path leads to repression, such as "Iron Fist" policies or "Three Strikes" laws. These almost always backfire because they fill prisons with young men who then professionalize and network, making the gangs more powerful and transnational. The second path is the one that leads to a sustainable peace, requiring a three-pronged approach: 1. The Dirty Deal Because the state is often too infiltrated to fight its way out, reformers must sometimes make "dirty deals" with warlords or criminal heads. In the Republic of Georgia, leaders gave warlords government positions to stop the bloodshed in the streets. It is an unpalatable but often necessary first step to stabilize the environment so that deeper reforms can begin. 2. Radical Inclusivity State-building must move toward the marginalized. When the poor feel the state is their enemy, they turn to "Robin Hood" criminals like Pablo Escobar for protection and resources. Reclaiming these citizens requires making the state present and helpful in the parts of the country it has previously ignored. This destroys the social base of criminal groups. 3. Targeted Enforcement Once the social base is weakened and the "dirty deals" have neutralized some actors, the state must professionalize its police to fight the remaining irreconcilable groups. This requires a level of intelligence-gathering that is only possible when the population trusts the government enough to share information. The Paradox of the Reformer The individuals who lead these transitions are rarely saints. They are often high-energy, egotistical, and hyper-focused. In Georgia, Mikheil Saakashvili was nicknamed the "Energizer Bunny" because of his relentless pace. These traits are necessary to break a corrupt system, but they carry a dark side. The same ego that allows a leader to believe they can save a failed state often turns into authoritarianism once they are in power. The population that votes a reformer in must eventually be prepared to vote them out to prevent a new form of tyranny. Real growth, whether for a nation or an individual, requires the humility to know when one's specific strengths have become a liability. A Future Built on Intentionality Ending violence is not a mystery of logistics; it is a challenge of political courage. We see that the most resilient societies are those that prioritize political equality alongside economic stability. When people believe their votes count, politicians are forced to cater to their needs rather than the needs of criminal financiers. This shift moves us away from a world of fear and toward one where human potential can actually flourish. The path out of a savage order is long and messy, but it is achievable through the intentional rebuilding of the social contract, one step at a time.