The Latency of Tradition: Why Modern Startups Must Rebuild the Talent Pipeline Speed is the only non-renewable resource in a startup. When a company moves from pre-seed to Series B in a blistering ten-month sprint, the traditional mechanics of hiring become a liability. Isaiah Granet, the visionary CEO of Bland AI, has proven that the standard tech pipeline—the well-trodden path from Stanford to big tech to venture-backed startups—is often too slow and too rigid for true market disruption. While competitors hunt for prestige, the winners hunt for obsession. Bland AI isn't just building voice AI infrastructure; they are re-engineering how a company survives its own growth. In the world of enterprise phone automation, where latency is the enemy, the team behind the product must be just as fast. This requires a shift in focus from what a candidate has done to what they are capable of becoming. If you are waiting for a resume to tell you a person is exceptional, you are already too late. You must look for the signal in the noise: the beekeeping obsession, the GitHub project built on a factory floor, or the philosophy major who thinks in logical loops rather than code blocks. Sourcing the Hidden Gem: Turning Non-Traditional Backgrounds into Competitive Advantages The most valuable talent in the market is often invisible to the algorithms of LinkedIn and the filters of HR consultants. Finding these "hidden gems" requires a willingness to look into the shadows of the labor market. One of the most striking examples from the Bland growth story is the hire of a founding engineer whose previous experience included managing a Taco Bell and working on a factory floor. On paper, most recruiters would discard the application. In reality, this individual had built a functional voice AI agent on GitHub and possessed an unteachable hunger to ship code. Obsession is a transferable skill. Whether someone is "nuts about beekeeping" or obsessed with YouTube marketing, that intensity can be redirected toward the company’s core mission. Isaiah Granet notes that about 25% of his team comes from cold inbound—people who had the tenacity to find the CEO’s email and pitch themselves. This is a vetting mechanism in itself. A cold email represents a person who takes initiative, bypasses gatekeepers, and focuses on outcomes. In a hypergrowth environment, you need people who don't wait for a manual; you need people who write the manual while the plane is in the air. The Philosophy of Logic over Syntax One of the more unconventional tactics at Bland is the active recruitment of philosophy majors. While the tech industry is obsessed with STEM degrees, philosophy majors bring a unique ability to think critically and solve problems from first principles. It is easier to teach a sharp thinker how to use Stripe or HubSpot than it is to teach a developer how to think through complex, non-linear problems. In the age of AI, where syntax is increasingly handled by the machine, the ability to architect logic is the true premium. Scaling the Unscalable: Managing Culture When Payroll Doesn't Run In the chaos of 2024, Bland didn't focus on being hyper-structured; they focused on survival and growth. Managing hypergrowth means choosing which fires to let burn. For Granet, this meant occasionally letting payroll run late because every ounce of energy was dedicated to closing enterprise contracts and building the fastest AI response times in the industry. This is a calculated risk. It requires a team that is not just employees, but partners in the struggle. However, as a company scales from 5 people to 75, the founders cannot be in every room. This is where culture becomes the only mechanism that scales. Culture is not a document on the wall; it is the collection of behaviors that a founder calls out or ignores. If a founder allows intellectual dishonesty to fester, that becomes the culture. If they celebrate high-octane output, that becomes the standard. By maintaining a flat structure where even BDRs are promoted into engineering and marketing roles, the company creates a sense of internal mobility that reinforces loyalty and intensity. The Executive Hustle: Hiring Experience without the Ego There is a common misconception that you cannot hire senior executives into a scrappy, young culture. The mistake isn't hiring for experience; it's hiring for a lack of flexibility. The ideal executive for a high-growth startup is a "ladder jumper"—someone whose career trajectory shows they skipped steps because they were too effective to be contained by a traditional promotion cycle. When hiring for these senior roles, Granet utilizes a "beer screen"—a test of whether he could spend 18 hours a day with this person without wanting to pull his hair out. But the personality fit must be backed by a trust in their ability to execute in an emergency. Investors like Michael Seibel and Gary Tan from Y Combinator often provide a sounding board for these hires, but the founder must remain the final arbiter. A crucial lesson for any founder is never to hire for a role you haven't tried to do yourself. If you haven't felt the pain of the job, you cannot measure the excellence of the candidate. The Architecture of Compensation and the Power of the Pivot Compensation at a startup is about more than just a number; it is about aligning incentives with long-term impact. Bland uses a sliding scale for compensation, allowing employees to choose a higher equity stake or a higher cash salary. This empowers the employee and signals their belief in the company’s future. Explaining equity is a fundamental responsibility of the founder. If an employee doesn't understand the potential of their shares, they aren't truly motivated by them. Furthermore, the "two-way street" of loyalty means being willing to pivot an employee into a new role if the current one isn't a fit. If an obsessed employee is failing in sales but has a passion for the product, moving them to a technical role preserves their institutional knowledge and their intensity while solving a talent gap. This fluidity is what allows a 75-person team to out-execute companies ten times their size. Final Outlook: The Future of High-Octane Hiring The trajectory of Bland AI—from getting rejected by 180 investors at Demo Day to raising a Series B from Emergence Capital and Scale Venture Partners—is a testament to the power of unconventional talent. The future belongs to founders who stop looking at where a person went to school and start looking at what they’ve built from zero to one. To ignite a market, you don't need the most prestigious team; you need the most obsessed one. Hire for passion, fire for dishonesty, and never let the tradition of the industry slow down the speed of your solution.
Y Combinator
Companies
- Mar 26, 2026
- Feb 19, 2026
- Jan 30, 2026
- Jan 28, 2026
- Jan 27, 2026
The shift from capital to connectivity in the startup ecosystem Andrew D’Souza, the visionary behind Clearco, is not a stranger to hyper-growth. Having built a nine-figure revenue business that deployed $5 billion to e-commerce brands, D’Souza observed a recurring bottleneck: capital is a commodity, but access is not. While Clearco focused on democratizing funds, his new venture, Boardy, aims to democratize the network itself. This isn't just another CRM or a matchmaking algorithm; it is a voice-based AI ‘super-connector’ designed to replicate the nuance, trust, and serendipity of a high-level human networker. D’Souza’s transition from fintech titan to AI architect was born from an obsession with GPT-3 in 2020. While running a 600-person company, he found himself spending 80% of his time on an internal project called **Clear Angel**, an AI coach for entrepreneurs. When the project was eventually shuttered by a board focused on core financial services, D’Souza realized his path lay in the frontier of generative intelligence. Boardy represents the culmination of that pivot—a platform that treats networking not as a database to be scraped, but as a dynamic, living economy built on goodwill. Why voice-first AI beats the LinkedIn paradigm The fundamental flaw in modern networking platforms like LinkedIn is dimensionality reduction. Most databases reduce a complex human being to a few tags: location, sector, and job title. Boardy operates on a different thesis. By utilizing synchronous, high-bandwidth voice conversations, the AI captures the ‘meta-signals’ that define quality: tone, intonation, problem-solving styles, and core values. Humans are biologically wired to communicate through sound. D’Souza argues that voice is a high-fidelity channel that allows an AI to understand why a specific founder is uniquely positioned to build a specific company at a specific time. This depth allows Boardy to map users into a multi-dimensional vector space. Instead of filtering people through rigid categories, the system performs vector multiplication to identify matches that generate the most mutual value. This approach has already led to extraordinary outcomes, including founders meeting lead investors and receiving term sheets within 72 hours of a single AI conversation. Intelligence over latency In the current AI landscape, many companies are racing to minimize latency to make interactions feel instantaneous. D’Souza has taken the opposite bet, prioritizing intelligence over speed. While real-time models are entertaining for brief exchanges, they often lack the depth required for a 30-minute strategic discussion. Boardy uses higher-compute frontier models to ensure that every introduction is contextually rich. The cost of compute is secondary to the economic upside of a perfect match. In the venture world, the difference between a mediocre introduction and a perfect one is measured in millions of dollars of enterprise value. The goodwill metric and the network effect flywheel Every time a human makes an introduction, they gamble their social capital. D’Souza has codified this as the ‘goodwill’ metric. Boardy functions as an unsupervised learning system optimizing for this specific cost function. If the AI makes a bad match, it burns goodwill; if it makes a successful one, it grows its trust bank. This creates a powerful emergent network effect. Unlike a human, Boardy never forgets a contact, never loses context, and can maintain thousands of live relationships simultaneously. To solve the classic cold start problem, D’Souza seeded the network with his own high-tier contacts from Toronto and San%20Francisco. By acting as a bridge for international founders entering the Silicon Valley ecosystem, Boardy quickly established a reputation for high-signal deals. The platform recently launched a program to help 100 founders raise capital, which saw 5,000 applicants ranging from Y%20Combinator alumni to Thiel%20Fellows. This caliber of users proves that even the most well-connected founders seek better market dynamics for their shares. Transforming venture firms with AI venture partners Boardy is now moving beyond its role as a general connector and into the institutional space. High-profile firms like Creandum are utilizing the AI to manage the overwhelming volume of inbound pitches. Most venture teams are small and cannot interview every applicant; Boardy serves as a tireless first-round screener. It doesn't just scan a deck; it conducts long-form interviews, allowing founders to tell their stories in a low-pressure environment. This utility was recently demonstrated with HF0, a prominent residency program in San%20Francisco. Boardy interviewed 600 applicants who would have otherwise been ignored by the human team. Of the top five candidates surfaced by the AI, the firm invested in three. This result highlights a massive market inefficiency: human bandwidth is currently the primary filter for innovation. By delegating the ‘search and screen’ function to an AI, firms can identify outliers that don't fit the standard venture template. The long-term vision: From super-connector to AI holding company D’Souza’s vision for Boardy extends far beyond fundraising. He envisions the AI evolving into a ‘Digital Richard Branson’—an entity that co-creates businesses by identifying gaps in its own network. If the AI sees a recurring need for a specific service among its 10,000 users, it can facilitate the formation of a company to solve it, take equity, and provide the initial customer base and capital through its own connections. This shift toward an AI holding company model represents the ultimate scale of a network effect. By owning assets with uncapped upside, Boardy transitions from a tool to an economic engine. D’Souza also emphasizes the role of ‘self-reflection’ in this evolution. The AI currently reviews its own database and code, suggesting improvements to its developers based on which conversations went ‘off the rails.’ It is a system designed for perpetual personal development. Innovation as a creative expression For D’Souza, building Boardy is as much a creative endeavor as it is a technical one. He draws parallels between entrepreneurs and artists, suggesting that great businesses are reflections of a founder’s worldview. He cites Steve%20Jobs and Richard%20Branson as inspirations—not just for their financial success, but for their ability to maintain imagination and playfulness. As we enter the AI age, D’Souza warns that the traditional education system often squeezes the imagination out of individuals. He sees Boardy as a tool to help founders reclaim that imaginative edge by handling the administrative friction of networking and capital raising. The future belongs to those who can combine sophisticated data engines with a human-centric focus on bonding and trust. Boardy is the infrastructure for that new economy, turning latent potential into realized GDP through the power of the perfect introduction.
Dec 3, 2025The Trap of Calculated Safety Most high-performers believe they are waiting for a "lucky break," but they are actually suffocating it with security. Guido Appenzeller famously declined founding roles at Google and Yahoo because he prioritized his PhD and job stability. This isn't just a missed paycheck; it is a fundamental misunderstanding of risk. When you protect your downside so fiercely that you refuse to engage with uncertainty, you eliminate the surface area where luck lands. In the tech ecosystem, playing it safe is the most expensive mistake you can make. Perception as a Competitive Advantage Luck is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Richard Wiseman proved this by showing that individuals who self-identify as lucky actually spot opportunities—literally finding money on the ground—that others miss. If you believe you are unlucky, your brain develops functional tunnel vision. You stop looking for the shortcuts and the $100 bills because you've convinced yourself they aren't meant for you. Shifting your mindset isn't about optimism; it's about keeping your peripheral vision open to the market's hidden signals. Turning Regret into Rocket Fuel Setbacks are not endings; they are forced pivots. Garry Tan initially turned down Peter Thiel for a role at Palantir to stay at Microsoft. That regret didn't paralyze him; it prepared him to say "yes" with conviction when the next door opened. Every rejection or missed moonshot provides the data necessary for your next breakthrough. High-growth founders don't mourn the basketball game when the ball turns into a frisbee; they immediately master the new game. The Luck Manufacturer's Mindset You are exactly one risk away from a completely different trajectory. Manufacturing luck requires three specific inputs: the courage to abandon comfort, the belief that fortune is accessible, and the agility to reframe every failure as a setup. Stop waiting for the universe to hand you a magic penny. Build the solution, take the hit, and keep your eyes open. The market rewards those who show up ready to be lucky.
Jul 31, 2025The Myth of the Overnight Success Most founders look for a silver bullet. They want the one feature or marketing hack that will put them on the map. But true disruption doesn't work that way. Look at Jiro Ono. He didn't become the world's greatest sushi master by reinventing the fish; he did it by making a thousand invisible tweaks every single day since 1951. In the startup world, we call this compounding. When you fuse your income with a obsessive devotion to craft, the math of growth flips. You stop chasing the market and the market starts chasing you. Building a Cornered Resource through Trust Compounding isn't just about code or product features; it’s about the moat you build around your reputation. Jiro spent decades at fish auctions at dawn. That consistency earned him a "cornered resource"—vendors who save the best tuna for him alone. In your startup, that translates to extreme user trust. Every time you fix a minor bug or perfect a single user interaction, you're paying interest on the principle of yesterday’s work. Eventually, the curve jackknifes upward and the world calls you a genius overnight. They didn't see the two hundred silent failures that bought you that brilliance. The Discipline of Zero-Bug Development We live in a culture of "move fast and break things," but shipping garbage is a death sentence. John Carmack and Steve Jobs understood that quality isn't a marketing department's job. It’s an engineering requirement. If you build on a buggy foundation, you’re sabotaging your future scalability. You must become your own best testing team. Never allow a user to experience a crash you already knew about. At Microsoft or Palantir, the standard was zero known bugs before a release. That discipline is what separates a toy from a tool. The Trinity of Mastery: Pull, Play, and Outlast To achieve Shokunin Kishu—perfection for its own sake—you need three things. First, **Pull**: Solve a problem so painful that users literally snatch the product out of your hands. Second, **Play**: Find the flow state where work feels like a game you’re winning. Finally, **Outlast**: Most of your competitors will quit when the curve stays flat. If you stay dead center in your lane for a decade, you don't just compete; you become the standard. The masterpiece begins the moment you decide that "good enough" is no longer an option.
Jul 23, 2025The Scarcity Trap Every founder has been there. You are pitching a Venture Capital firm, and your voice hits a higher pitch. You need the cash to survive. This is where most startups die—not from a lack of product-market fit, but from the stench of desperation. Garry Tan notes that scarcity is the fastest deal killer in the universe. When you signal that you cannot survive without an investor's check, you aren't showing hustle; you are broadcasting risk. Capital doesn't flow to those who beg; it chases those who are already moving. Contentment as a Competitive Advantage Flip the script. The most dangerous founders are the ones living on ramen, building in silence, and signaling they will launch with or without you. This isn't arrogance; it is sovereignty. Naval Ravikant argues that networking is largely overrated. If you build something undeniable, the helpers appear unasked. By focusing on the work rather than the chase, you flip the leverage. You stop negotiating from a place of need and start fielding inbound interest. Rejection as Fuel, Not Identity How you handle a 'no' defines your trajectory. Even the CEO of Y Combinator faced rejection from the Mayfield Fellows Program. The difference between a winner and a casualty is how fast they dust themselves off. If you take rejection personally, you validate the person who rejected you. If you treat it as feedback, you become a 'definite optimist'—someone who knows they have a clear shot at the prize, even if the current path is blocked. The Power of Presence Stop scanning the horizon for a savior. As Alan Watts observed, chasing the future only confirms that it isn't yet yours. Real power lives in the cortex, in the code, and in the hardware you are building today. When you look inside and focus on internal conviction rather than external validation, reality begins to bend in your favor. Drop the hunt. Embody the prize. The market belongs to those who can walk away from a bad deal and build something the world hasn't seen yet.
Jul 9, 2025The Hidden Saboteur in Your Psyche Market volatility and aggressive competitors aren't the primary killers of startups. The most lethal threat is the founder's own unexamined psychology. While most leaders obsess over product-market fit and burn rates, they neglect the internal fractures that lead to catastrophic blind spots. Carl Jung identified the "shadow" as the rejected parts of our identity. When ignored, these traits project onto teams, creating toxic cultures and stalled decision-making. For any visionary, recognizing that your company’s growth is capped by your own personal development is the first step toward true market disruption. Reclaiming the Golden Shadow There is a positive dimension to this darkness known as the **Golden Shadow**. This term, popularized by William A. Miller, refers to undeveloped talents and strengths you've buried due to fear or social conditioning. You see your golden shadow in the people you envy. That painful awe you feel for a bold CEO or a brilliant designer isn't just admiration; it is a mirror of your own latent potential. Tapping into these hidden assets turns an insecure manager into a high-impact leader. The Founder's Integration Playbook 1. **Identify the Mirror**: List the leaders you idolize. Their specific traits—fearless speaking, radical creativity, or decisiveness—are seeds existing within you. 2. **Own the Latent Trait**: Acknowledge that you have permission to embody these strengths. Use tools like the Adverse Childhood Experiences test to understand why you originally suppressed them. 3. **Execute Micro-Experiments**: Don't aim for overnight transformation. Practice small reps, like speaking up in a board meeting or brainstorming without a filter for one hour. 4. **Iterate and Integrate**: Bring these reclaimed strengths into your daily operations. Whether it's leading with a new vision or driving a product meeting with conviction, treat your psyche like a product that requires constant updates. Conclusion: The Ultimate Competitive Advantage Inner work is a strategic investment. When you release the "parking brake" of self-doubt, you build better companies and more resilient cultures. The most successful founders aren't just tech experts; they are individuals who have integrated their whole selves to meet the market's demands.
Jun 12, 2025The Strategic Pivot to Reasoning Models Innovation moves fast, but the shift from basic large language models to complex reasoning systems represents a fundamental transition in the technological hierarchy. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, identifies the O-series of models as a critical strategic priority. This isn't just about adding more parameters; it's about unlocking the ability for models to contribute to scientific discovery and write sophisticated code. Reasoning allows models to move beyond statistical word prediction and toward active problem-solving. This shift changes the value proposition for every developer in the ecosystem. If a model can reason through a five-step scientific process, it moves from being a simple assistant to a legitimate research partner. The trajectory here is steep. The shortcomings we see today in GPT-4 or early reasoning previews will be systematically eliminated by future generations. To build a lasting company, you must bet on this improvement rather than hoping it slows down. Avoiding the Startup Steamroller A recurring anxiety in the Silicon Valley ecosystem is the fear of being "steamrolled" by the foundation model providers. Many founders have built businesses that essentially function as feature-patches for current model limitations. This is a dangerous game. If your business model relies on OpenAI failing to fix a current bug or performance gap, you are betting against the most well-capitalized R&D engines in history. The goal is to build products that benefit as the models get better. Think of it as a rising tide. If you build a specialized AI tutor or a medical advisor, your service becomes exponentially more valuable when the underlying model gains better reasoning or lower latency. You want to be the one riding the model's progress, not the one trying to fill the holes it hasn't patched yet. Trillions of dollars in market cap will be created by those who identify vertical applications that were previously impractical. The opportunity lies in the application layer, provided those applications aren't just thin wrappers around a temporary deficit. The Agentic Future: Beyond Restaurant Reservations Everyone talks about AI agents, but the current discourse often focuses on trivial tasks like booking a dinner table. Sam Altman views this as a failure of imagination. True agentic value comes from a "senior co-worker" model—a system that can take a long-duration task, perhaps spanning two weeks, and execute it with minimal supervision. The real disruption occurs when agents do things humans physically cannot. Imagine an agent calling 300 restaurants simultaneously to find the exact table with a specific dish, rather than just one. This massive parallelism creates a new kind of economic bandwidth. This evolution will likely force a total rethink of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) pricing. Moving from "per seat" licensing to compute-based or outcome-based pricing is not just possible; it's inevitable. When a single piece of software can perform the work of an entire department, the traditional seat-based model collapses. We are moving toward a world where you buy a block of compute to solve a problem, not a login for a human user. The Complexity of the AI Fractal Building a foundation model company is no longer just a research problem; it is an industrial-scale logistical challenge. Sam Altman describes the current environment as a complex, fractal system where every level of operation impacts the next. You have to balance semiconductor supply chains, power availability, and networking decisions against the rapid pace of research breakthroughs. If your research isn't ready when the hardware arrives, you've wasted billions. If you build a system that you can't afford to run, the product fails. This ecosystem complexity is unlike anything seen in the internet or mobile revolutions. While figures like Larry Ellison suggest a $100 billion entry fee for the model race, the true cost is arguably more about the "special sauce" of organizational culture. The ability to repeatedly do something new and unproven is the rarest commodity in the market. Many can copy GPT-4 now that it exists, but very few can envision and execute the next leap into the unknown. Human Potential and the Five-Year Horizon One of the most profound implications of widespread AI is its ability to maximize human potential. Currently, massive amounts of talent are wasted due to geographic, economic, or institutional barriers. AI can act as a universal leveling tool, providing elite-level tutoring and engineering support to anyone with an internet connection. Looking five years out, we should expect a paradox. The rate of technological advancement will be blistering—scientific discoveries that once took decades may happen in months. Yet, society might change less than we expect. We have already seen this with the Turing test; computers effectively passed it, and the world didn't stop. We simply integrated the miracle into our daily routines and moved on. The future belongs to those who can maintain their focus on the 10x leaps rather than the 10% increments. If you are starting today, don't build a better tool; build a better way to solve a fundamental human problem using the most powerful reasoning engine ever devised.
Nov 4, 2024The Shift from Traditional Banking to High-Octane Entrepreneurship Akshat Goenka, now a Partner at Moonfire, didn't find his calling in the structured, process-driven corridors of JP Morgan. Despite the intellectual caliber of his peers, he quickly realized that a career in banking offered minimal room for personal input or disruptive change. This realization acted as a catalyst, pushing him toward the volatile but rewarding world of startups. At just 22, he launched a telemedicine platform, DocTalk, which eventually secured a spot at Y Combinator. This transition highlights a critical theme in modern business: the shift from being a cog in a massive financial machine to becoming the architect of a new solution. The drive to question broken processes and find scalable improvements is what separates the modern entrepreneur from the traditional corporate executive. The Y Combinator Crucible and the Art of Intellectual Honesty The journey through Y Combinator is often described as a boot camp, but for Goenka, it was a fundamental recalibration of how to think about a business. The application process itself is a tool for strategic clarity. It forces founders to confront the "nth degree of why" behind every decision. Many founders fall into the trap of chasing vanity metrics or following industry trends without understanding the underlying mechanics of their own business. The YC framework demands a level of intellectual honesty that often leads to necessary pivots. In the case of DocTalk, this meant evolving from a B2C marketplace to a B2B2C model after a deep dive into the specific power dynamics and incentives of the Indian healthcare ecosystem. Success at this stage isn't just about doing things right; it's about avoiding the distractions that lead to failure, specifically focusing on product and growth above all else. Moonfire and the Quantified Venture Capital Model At Moonfire, the investment philosophy centers on the belief that venture capital is ripe for a data-driven overhaul. While traditional firms rely heavily on gut feel and network serendipity, Moonfire utilizes software, data, and machine learning to accelerate the entire lifecycle. This isn't just about sourcing; it's about filtering millions of entities to find the most promising opportunities. The firm tracks over 4 million entities globally, using semantic search and analysis to prioritize the top 200-250 companies every week for human review. This "human augmentation" allows investors to move away from repetitive manual tasks and focus on high-quality decision-making. By automating the workflows that typically consume a VC's time, the team can spend more energy meeting founders and helping their portfolio companies scale. It’s a visionary approach that treats the venture firm itself like a tech startup, complete with internal product management roles and engineering sprints. Navigating the Challenges of Emerging Markets Building a tech company in a market like India presents unique infrastructure and cultural challenges. When DocTalk was in its growth phase, the digital economy was performing despite a lack of pervasive broadband or API-friendly infrastructure. Founders had to navigate an environment where basic digital tools were still becoming mainstream. This reality forced a higher level of resilience and creative problem-solving. Goenka notes that in these environments, cultural aversion to new technology in core services like healthcare and education can be a significant barrier. Understanding the specific "why now" for a market is crucial. Without a clear perspective on timing and the readiness of the ecosystem, even a well-funded, YC-backed company can hit an insurmountable roadblock. The lesson for global entrepreneurs is clear: local context and infrastructure readiness are just as important as the product itself. The Human Element in a Machine-Driven Future As capital allocation becomes more data-reliant, a philosophical question arises: can machines eventually replace the human investor? Goenka and his peers suggest that while data can significantly improve selection and speed, the
Jul 3, 2024