The High Stakes of Foundational AI Development Artificial intelligence has transitioned from a specialized academic pursuit to the central engine of the global economy. While the market is flooded with thousands of startups claiming to innovate within the space, a stark reality remains: only about ten companies globally possess the resources and technical expertise to build the foundational models that serve as the industry's backbone. Cohere, valued at nearly $7 billion, stands as a critical pillar among these giants. Founded by former Google engineers, the firm has carved out a unique position by ignoring the consumer-facing chatbot wars in favor of a rigorous, enterprise-only strategy. Building these models is less like traditional software engineering and more akin to aerospace engineering. It requires a massive convergence of specialized talent, astronomical compute power, and curated data. Nick%20Frosst, co-founder of Cohere, notes that the process is inherently resource-intensive. Success depends on hundreds of brilliant minds working in tight unison to manage the complex experimentation required to make a model perform reliably. This high barrier to entry explains why the foundational layer of AI remains a small oligopoly while the application layer expands exponentially. The Lineage of Intelligence: From Google Brain to Cohere The intellectual pedigree of Cohere is rooted in the very birthplace of modern AI. Nick Frosst honed his skills at Google%20Brain, working under Geoffrey%20Hinton, widely recognized as the 'Godfather of AI.' Hinton’s legacy is defined by his decades-long tenacity in pursuing neural networks even when the broader scientific community dismissed them. His work in the early 2010s regarding image recognition proved that neural nets were not just a theoretical concept but the most effective tool for machine learning. This persistence laid the groundwork for everything we see today. Frosst’s co-founder, Aiden%20Gomez, was a primary author of the seminal 2017 paper "Attention Is All You Need," which introduced the transformer architecture. This breakthrough shifted the machine learning paradigm. For the first time, researchers realized that the most effective way to solve a specific language task was not to train a model solely on that task, but to train it on a vast, diverse array of data. This realization that "generalist" training produces superior specialists is the core thesis that led to the formation of Cohere in 2019. Unlike OpenAI or Anthropic, which maintain broad consumer and research mandates, Cohere was built with the singular mission of making these transformers work within the strict confines of the corporate world. The Enterprise Pivot: Security, Privacy, and Efficiency The AI narrative shifted dramatically with the release of ChatGPT, but Frosst argues the real revolution was in 'productization' rather than a fundamental technological leap. The consumerization of AI allowed non-technical users to interact with models without a prescriptive interface. However, for large-scale enterprises, a chat window is insufficient. Corporations require models that can be deployed within their own secure environments, ensuring that private data never leaks back into the public training set. Cohere differentiates itself by offering an agentic platform designed to automate complex workflows rather than just answering questions. Whether it is cross-referencing email briefs with Salesforce data or conducting deep-dive analysis on private data rooms, the goal is high-utility automation. This focus on the 'boring' but essential tasks of business—data retrieval, summarization, and process automation—positions Cohere as a utility provider rather than a social companion. By focusing on SAS-like margins and avoiding the massive losses associated with free consumer tiers, Cohere presents a more traditional, sustainable business model for the public markets. Challenging the AGI Religion A significant portion of the AI industry is currently obsessed with the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—the point where a machine matches or exceeds human intelligence across all domains. Figures like Sam%20Altman have become central to this almost religious narrative. Frosst, however, remains a vocal skeptic of the idea that current transformer technology will lead to AGI. He characterizes the AGI obsession as a "narrative device" rather than a scientific certainty. Humans are embodied creatures who learn through interaction and intervention in the physical world. Large language models, by contrast, are currently restricted to predicting the next token based on digital text. While they are transformative for cognitive labor, they lack the cultural context and strategic nuance inherent in human intelligence. Frosst argues that focusing on AGI distracts from the immediate, tangible policy discussions we need to have today. The goal should not be to build a "digital god" but to create tools that free human time for strategic and creative thinking. The Labor Market and the New Industrial Revolution The introduction of AI into the enterprise inevitably raises the specter of mass unemployment. Frosst views this shift through the lens of economic history, comparing AI to the steam engine or the automated loom. These technologies were inherently disruptive and caused short-term chaos, but they ultimately proved value-accretive for society. He estimates that AI can currently automate 20% to 30% of a desk-based worker's tasks. This is augmentative rather than purely reductive; it removes the drudgery of data entry and basic synthesis, allowing workers to focus on higher-order alignment and coordination. However, the macroeconomic risk is real. Frosst expresses deep concern regarding wealth inequality. The primary danger is that the value created by AI will accrue almost exclusively to the owners of the technology, exacerbating a decades-long trend of wealth concentration. He rejects the "Luddite" label, arguing that the solution is not to halt technological progress but to implement robust public policy. Governments must act to ensure better income distribution so that the efficiency gains of AI do not result in a permanently bifurcated society. This requires moving the conversation away from existential sci-fi threats and toward the mundane but vital work of labor policy and tax reform. Geopolitics and the Future of Infrastructure AI has become a new front in the global geopolitical race, with development concentrated in just four countries: the U.S., China, France, and Canada. Frosst views foundational models as a form of digital infrastructure, comparable to nuclear power plants or national highway systems. For a nation to remain competitive and secure, it must have the domestic capability to build and maintain this technology. As Cohere moves toward an eventual IPO, its identity as a Canadian-based, enterprise-focused firm offers a strategic alternative to the Silicon Valley monoculture. The goal is to build a generational company that outlasts its founders. By staying grounded in historical context and focusing on the practical utility of AI at work, Frosst believes the industry can navigate this chaotic period and emerge as a foundational layer of a more efficient global economy. The future of AI is not about machines that think like us, but about machines that work for us, allowing humans to reclaim the most valuable resource of all: time.
Toronto
Places
- Mar 1, 2026
- Jan 29, 2026
- Dec 3, 2025
- Nov 4, 2025
- Jan 27, 2025
The Grandmother Treatment: A Study in Platonic Deselection While the concept of the friend zone describes a woman's decision to categorize a male suitor as non-romantic, Ryan Long argues that men employ a distinct psychological maneuver known as the **grandmother treatment**. This social dynamic involves stripping all sexual subtext from an interaction to maintain peace or social order. Unlike a standard friendship, which might still carry a faint undercurrent of attraction, the grandmother treatment creates an impenetrable barrier. You treat the person with polite, sterile kindness—much like you would an elderly relative—ensuring that no romantic or sexual tension can ever take root. Strategic Aversion and the Social Shield Men often deploy this tactic in high-stakes social environments where romantic entanglement would be catastrophic. Chris Williamson notes that this is particularly relevant for coworkers, a friend's ex-girlfriend, or a woman your close friend is actively pursuing. By adopting the grandmother treatment, a man effectively "detaches" his sexual identity from the room. He becomes the "gay best friend" archetype or the harmless observer. This isn't just politeness; it is a calculated defense mechanism designed to prevent social friction and preserve reputation in tight-knit communities like Austin or professional circles. Psychological Ownership of Thoughts A fascinating divergence exists in how genders perceive their internal monologues. Ryan Long suggests men view their intrusive or aggressive thoughts as a separate, unreliable entity—a "piece of [ __ ] friend" they must constantly manage. Conversely, he observes that women often treat their thoughts like an abusive ex-boyfriend, defending irrational or emotionally charged ideas with intense loyalty. This difference explains why men might more easily categorize others into the grandmother zone; they are used to telling their own impulses to be quiet. The Groggy Defense: Strategic Ignorance Beyond categorization, social evasion often takes the form of the "groggy tired guy." This persona allows individuals to dodge accountability or difficult relationship milestones by feigning exhaustion or mental fog. Ryan Long points out that this tactic is prevalent among public figures, such as rappers in interviews, who use a persona of being "out of it" to avoid prying questions. Whether in a relationship or a media scrum, pretending you aren't fully present serves as a powerful shield against unwanted confrontation.
Nov 13, 2024The Mirror of the Algorithm Every scroll and pause on our screens feeds a sophisticated system designed to map the human shadow. TikTok utilizes front-facing cameras to detect micro-expressions, translating subtle facial shifts into data points for engagement. This mechanism creates a feedback loop where curiosity—even when driven by shock or confusion—is interpreted as preference. When users encounter "freak show" content or unusual niches, the system mistakes a lingering gaze for a desire for more, eventually narrowing a person's digital identity into a caricature of their most fleeting impulses. Content Loopholes and Social Engineering Content creators have learned to navigate platform restrictions by utilizing "educational" loopholes. A prominent example is the rise of adult breastfeeding content on YouTube, where creators use the guise of maternity advice to bypass nudity filters. By using fake babies or framing the content as instructional, they tap into massive audiences while remaining within the letter of the law. This practice highlights the constant tension between platform moderation and the ingenuity of the attention economy. Cultural Contexts of Global Search Trends Search data provides a window into regional psychological dynamics. In India, a significant portion of breastfeeding searches focuses on adult partners rather than infants. This trend may stem from deep-seated cultural structures, such as the "Golden Child" syndrome, where sons are intensely babied by overbearing maternal figures. Similarly, the prevalence of tickling fetishes in Japan reflects a broader cultural fascination with childlike aesthetics and "kawaii" fashion, suggesting that our online fixations are often extensions of local societal pressures. Reclaiming Personal Narratives To move toward healthy habit formation, we must recognize that we are not passive recipients of our feeds. One can "hack" their own experience by intentionally consuming mundane content—like horse hoof cleaning tutorials—to reset the digital environment. Growth requires us to step outside these curated bubbles and reflect on why certain trends capture the global imagination, ensuring our digital lives reflect our values rather than our basest curiosities.
Nov 3, 2024The quietude of a Mauritanian afternoon in late 1998 was shattered not by a siren, but by the ringing of a telephone. Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a talented engineer who had studied in Germany, answered a call from his cousin. It was a request for money—a sick father, a family duty. In the labyrinthine world of global intelligence, however, this single connection was a death knell. The cousin had used a satellite phone linked to Al-Qaeda, and the digital shadow of that call began a decade-long descent into a nightmare that would eventually be captured in the film The Mauritanian. This was the beginning of an ordeal that tests the very limits of human psychology, resilience, and the capacity for grace. The Anatomy of an Unintended Descent When we look at the trajectory of Slahi’s capture, we see a chilling example of how fear can distort truth. Following 9/11, the world entered a state of hyper-vigilance where innocence was no longer the default state; it had to be proven. Despite investigations in Germany and Canada finding no evidence of criminal activity, the sheer persistence of suspicion became its own proof. This phenomenon, which psychologists often call the 'confirmation bias' of systems, meant that every move Slahi made—even fleeing to Canada for a fresh start—was interpreted as the tactical maneuver of a high-level operative. The United States viewed him through a lens of 'guilty until proven useful.' His journey back to Mauritania was driven by an emotional vulnerability we all share: the love for a parent. Intelligence agencies lured him back by telling his mother he was in trouble and needed to clear his name. In our coaching sessions, we often talk about how our deepest values—like family loyalty—can sometimes make us vulnerable. Slahi's choice to return was a calculated risk born of a son's devotion. He watched his mother fade into the rearview mirror as he was driven away, holding her prayer beads, never to see her again. This moment represents the ultimate psychological rupture—the severance from one's safety net into a world where rules no longer apply. Surviving the Void of Total Darkness Slahi’s eight-month stay in Jordan was a prelude to the horrors of Guantanamo Bay. He lived in the 'fear of the prospect of torture,' a state that is often more psychologically damaging than the physical act itself. The brain, when deprived of certainty, creates its own horrific soundtracks. He describes how plugging his ears only made the sounds louder as his mind filled the silence with the cries of others. This is the physiological reality of extreme isolation; the mind becomes a mirror of its environment. If the environment is one of cruelty, the mind begins to eat itself. His transfer to Guantanamo Bay was marked by a visceral realization of his status. Stripped naked, placed in diapers, and handled like cargo, the dehumanization was complete. From a psychological perspective, this 'radical dispossession' is designed to break the ego. When you are no longer allowed to manage your own basic biological functions, like using a bathroom, the self begins to fragment. Slahi noted that he felt his African, Arab, and Muslim identities were 'three strikes' against him. In this state of total vulnerability, he made a silent pact with himself: if he ever returned to life, he would be a 'good person.' This is the 'post-traumatic growth' we see in resilient individuals—the decision to use suffering as a catalyst for a new, more intentional moral code. The Illusion of Enhanced Interrogation In 2003, Slahi was officially enrolled in what the Department of Defense euphemistically called 'enhanced interrogation.' The reality was a 70-day period of total sleep deprivation, sexual assault, and physical beatings that resulted in broken ribs and a destroyed gallbladder. The mechanics of sleep deprivation are particularly insidious. Interrogators used a 'water diet,' forcing him to drink massive quantities so that he could never close his eyes for more than an hour without his body forcing him to wake up. He became the architect of his own torture, a psychological trap meant to erode the will. He entered a different dimension of existence where the boundaries between reality and hallucination blurred. Yet, the turning point was not physical pain, but the threat against his mother. The interrogators threatened to arrest her and place her in an all-male prison. This is the 'breaking point' that intelligence officers like Richard Zully seek—the moment when a person will say anything to protect a loved one. Slahi began to confess to phantom plots, including an attack on the CN Tower in Toronto, a place he had never even visited. These 'false confessions' are a well-documented psychological byproduct of torture; under enough pressure, the brain prioritizes survival over truth. Finding Humanity in the Uniform One of the most profound aspects of Slahi’s narrative is his ability to see the humanity in his captors. He recounts stories of guards like Jeddah who smuggled him blueberry muffins and interrogators who cried when he was taken for a mock execution. This capacity for empathy is a masterclass in resilience. By refusing to dehumanize those who were dehumanizing him, Slahi maintained his own sense of self. He recognized that many of these soldiers were caught in their own cycles of fear and 'going along to get along.' He observed the power of propaganda through his interactions with a lieutenant named Mary, who watched the film Black Hawk Down with him. While she saw it as a testament to American bravery, Slahi saw it as a study in how a narrative can blind people to their own hypocrisy. He noticed the guards were suffering from PTSD, suggesting that inflicting pain is a 'cross-cultural phenomenon' that scars the perpetrator as much as the victim. This insight—that we are all susceptible to the 'virus' of anger—is what allowed him to eventually choose a path of radical forgiveness. The Selfishness of Forgiveness When Slahi talks about forgiveness, he doesn’t frame it as a gift to his torturers. He calls it 'doing myself a favor.' This is a crucial distinction in the psychology of healing. To hold onto resentment is to remain shackled to the prison long after the gates have opened. By forgiving men like Richard Zully, Slahi reclaimed his agency. He refused to let his 'biography dictate his future,' a concept he credits to the motivational speaker Tony Robbins. His liberation was not just a legal event—it was a spiritual one. Even after a lie detector test proved his innocence in 2003, he was held for another nine years. In that decade of limbo, he wrote Guantanamo Diary, turning his suffering into a testimony. He realized that 'nice people' are those who choose to be kind even when there is no reward. He regretted his small unkindnesses from his previous life more than his lack of wealth or status. This shift in perspective—prioritizing 'being nice' over 'being right'—is the ultimate mindset shift for anyone seeking to overcome trauma. A Global Perspective on Freedom Today, Slahi lives as a free man, but the 'stigma of Guantanamo' follows him. He was denied a visa to attend the premiere of his own movie in the United Kingdom. The circular logic of the system persists: if you were there, you must have deserved to be there. Yet, his message remains one of peace and bridge-building. He advocates for a 'human identity' that transcends religion and nationality. He notes that the people who stood by him most during his ordeal were not just Muslims, but Christians, Jews, and atheists. His story is a reminder to all of us to appreciate the 'normal blessings' we take for granted: the ability to turn off a light, to use a bathroom in private, to see our families. He has become a 'bookend' for anger, refusing to pass the virus of hatred to his son, Ahmed. As we navigate our own challenges, we can draw strength from his resilience. Growth happens when we decide that our experiences, no matter how horrific, do not have the final say in who we become. We have the power to stop the cycle of retribution and choose, quite simply, to be nice.
May 17, 2021