Correlation is Not Causation: Debunking AI Job Panic
Introduction: Resisting Data Misinterpretation
A provocative chart is circulating, attempting to draw a direct, causal link between the launch of
The Flawed Premise: Correlation vs. Causation
The chart presents two trends—the rise of an AI tool and the fall of job openings—and implies the first caused the second. This is a dangerous logical fallacy. Simply because two events occur in the same timeframe does not mean one is responsible for the other. Attributing a complex macroeconomic shift to a single product launch is a profound oversimplification. It ignores the powerful, systemic forces that were already reshaping the labor market.

Unpacking the Real Economic Drivers
To understand the decline in job openings, we must consider the actual economic context, which was dominated by far larger factors than a new software release.
The COVID-19 Anomaly
The job market of 2021 and early 2022 was not normal. Government stimulus and post-lockdown reopening created an artificial surge in demand for labor, pushing job openings to unsustainable highs. The subsequent decline was not a crash but a necessary and predictable normalization as the economy stabilized. The peak was the anomaly, not the correction.
The Impact of Monetary Policy
Simultaneously, central banks began an aggressive tightening cycle to combat inflation. Rising interest rates are designed to cool an overheated economy, which explicitly includes slowing the labor market. Companies, facing higher borrowing costs and anticipating a slowdown, naturally pulled back on hiring. This policy action is a much more direct and potent explanation for falling job openings.
The Reality of Labor Market Churn
Headlines about tech layoffs can be alarming, but they lack perspective. The U.S. job market is incredibly dynamic. In a single quarter, millions of jobs are created while millions are eliminated. For instance, in one recent quarter, 7.5 million jobs were destroyed, but 7.7 million were gained. This constant churn is a sign of a flexible economy, and focusing only on the losses misses the larger picture of net stability.
Conclusion: A Prudent Outlook on AI and Jobs
Will AI impact the future of work? Absolutely. Thoughtful planning for this transition is essential. However, the claim that it has already caused a massive, immediate crash in the job market is not supported by the data. The real story lies in post-pandemic normalization and deliberate monetary policy. As always, a resilient financial future is built on clear-eyed analysis, not on reacting to misleading charts.

Fancy watching it?
Watch the full video and context