Correlation is Not Causation: Debunking AI Job Panic

Introduction: Resisting Data Misinterpretation

A provocative chart is circulating, attempting to draw a direct, causal link between the launch of

and a sharp decline in U.S. job openings. This is a classic case of a chart crime—a misleading visualization that confuses correlation with causation. Panic is a poor investment strategy. True financial prudence requires us to look beyond sensational claims and analyze the complete economic picture.

The Flawed Premise: Correlation vs. Causation

The chart presents two trends—the rise of an AI tool and the fall of job openings—and implies the first caused the second. This is a dangerous logical fallacy. Simply because two events occur in the same timeframe does not mean one is responsible for the other. Attributing a complex macroeconomic shift to a single product launch is a profound oversimplification. It ignores the powerful, systemic forces that were already reshaping the labor market.

Correlation is Not Causation: Debunking AI Job Panic
A MASSIVE CHART CRIME

Unpacking the Real Economic Drivers

To understand the decline in job openings, we must consider the actual economic context, which was dominated by far larger factors than a new software release.

The COVID-19 Anomaly

The job market of 2021 and early 2022 was not normal. Government stimulus and post-lockdown reopening created an artificial surge in demand for labor, pushing job openings to unsustainable highs. The subsequent decline was not a crash but a necessary and predictable normalization as the economy stabilized. The peak was the anomaly, not the correction.

The Impact of Monetary Policy

Simultaneously, central banks began an aggressive tightening cycle to combat inflation. Rising interest rates are designed to cool an overheated economy, which explicitly includes slowing the labor market. Companies, facing higher borrowing costs and anticipating a slowdown, naturally pulled back on hiring. This policy action is a much more direct and potent explanation for falling job openings.

The Reality of Labor Market Churn

Headlines about tech layoffs can be alarming, but they lack perspective. The U.S. job market is incredibly dynamic. In a single quarter, millions of jobs are created while millions are eliminated. For instance, in one recent quarter, 7.5 million jobs were destroyed, but 7.7 million were gained. This constant churn is a sign of a flexible economy, and focusing only on the losses misses the larger picture of net stability.

Conclusion: A Prudent Outlook on AI and Jobs

Will AI impact the future of work? Absolutely. Thoughtful planning for this transition is essential. However, the claim that it has already caused a massive, immediate crash in the job market is not supported by the data. The real story lies in post-pandemic normalization and deliberate monetary policy. As always, a resilient financial future is built on clear-eyed analysis, not on reacting to misleading charts.

Correlation is Not Causation: Debunking AI Job Panic

Fancy watching it?

Watch the full video and context

3 min read