Nudging Toward Health: Reshaping Choices Through Environmental Design
The choices we make, particularly concerning our health, often appear to be deeply personal and rational. However, as Dr. Shajwan Nanakali elucidates, these decisions are profoundly influenced by the environments we inhabit. Her work at Tishk International University mirrors a growing understanding in public health: that by subtly altering our surroundings, we can encourage healthier behaviors without resorting to restrictive mandates.
The Stairwell Paradox
Dr. Nanakali begins with a simple observation. Despite knowing the benefits of physical activity, students consistently chose elevators over a short flight of stairs. This prompts a critical question: why do individuals, even those with medical knowledge, fail to translate awareness into action? This disconnect, she notes, extends beyond stairwells to dietary habits, where the consumption of fruits and vegetables remains startlingly low, a trend observed not only locally in Iraq but across the Middle East.

The Genesis of 'Nudge' Theory
To bridge this gap between knowledge and behavior, Dr. Nanakali and her team turned to 'nudge' theory. This concept, popularized by Thaler and Sunstein, posits that our decisions are less rational and more susceptible to environmental cues than we often assume. We gravitate toward what is easiest, most visible, and socially normative. The power of 'nudge' lies in its ability to guide choices without infringing on autonomy.
Experimentation and Environmental Transformation
To test the effectiveness of nudge theory, Dr. Nanakali's team implemented two interventions on their university campus, the first involved increasing the availability of fruit. Initially, simply placing whole fruits at the entrance resulted in a modest increase in consumption. Building on this, the team then enhanced the intervention by displaying images of fruit on screens and posters around campus and, crucially, preparing 'fruit cups'—a culturally resonant approach inspired by Middle Eastern traditions where fruit is washed, peeled, and cut for easy consumption.
The results were striking. The consumption of fruit increased by 157%. This underscores a key insight: convenience and presentation matter. By making the healthy option the easy option, students were far more likely to choose it.
The second experiment focused on stair usage. The team created a colorful footpath leading to the stairs, kept the stairwell doors open, posted motivational signs about calorie loss, and displayed the faculty schedule to draw students to the stairwell. The results showed a 10% increase in staircase usage, however, more interestingly, Dr. Nanakali observed a 'social proof' effect. Once one person in a group chose the stairs or a fruit cup, others tended to follow suit, highlighting the powerful influence of social norms.
Redefining Public Health
Dr. Nanakali's work offers a valuable lesson for public health. Instead of waiting for ideal conditions or large-scale policy changes, small, targeted interventions can yield significant results. With minimal resources—fruits, cups, stickers, and team effort—they achieved immediate improvements in dietary and exercise habits. The ultimate goal is to foster sustainable habits that reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, lower diabetes levels, and decrease overall mortality rates.
Shaping Environments, Shaping Futures
Ultimately, Dr. Nanakali challenges us to shift our perspective. The question is not why younger generations are not making healthy choices, but how we can redesign environments to make those choices more appealing and accessible. By focusing on environmental changes, we can leverage the power of 'nudges' to promote healthier lifestyles within our communities. This approach is about improving health outcomes for entire populations in ways that are both effective and engaging.

Fancy watching it?
Watch the full video and context