Laravel AI SDK Benchmark: Performance and Cost Across 5 LLM Providers

Navigating the Multi-LLM Ecosystem

Building AI-powered features in

often feels like a gamble when it comes to predicting performance and cost. Clients expect the snappy, consistent experience of

, but the reality of API integrations is far more volatile. I put the

to the test across five major providers:

,

,

,

, and

. By implementing these in a real-world

CMS project, I analyzed how different models handle title suggestions, tweet creation, translation, and image generation.

The Realities of API Speed and Reliability

One of the most striking takeaways from this experiment is the massive variance in latency. While

delivers text results in roughly two seconds, more complex models like

can take over 20 seconds for the same prompt. Even more concerning is the inherent instability of these services. During my testing,

failed with an unknown finish reason, and multiple models timed out during long translation tasks. This unpredictability makes robust error handling and background job queues non-negotiable for any production-grade Laravel application.

Cost Efficiency: The Rise of DeepSeek and Grok

If you are optimizing for the bottom line, the results are clear.

and

's

are the champions of cost-effectiveness. In many text-based operations, these providers didn't even crack a single cent in usage fees. Conversely,

sits at the top of the price bracket, costing significantly more for marginal improvements in creative output. For standard CMS tasks like generating SEO titles, the "mini" or "flash" models from any provider offer the best balance of quality and budget.

Laravel AI SDK Benchmark: Performance and Cost Across 5 LLM Providers — I Tried Laravel AI SDK with 5 LLM Providers: Speed, Cost, and Issues

Translation and Image Generation Limits

Translating long-form articles exposes the technical ceiling of these APIs. Many models surpassed the 60-second PHP execution limit, emphasizing that these tasks must live in the queue. Image generation is a different beast entirely.

often triggered safety filters when I mentioned specific names, and the cost per image spiked to nearly 16 cents for high-end models. While

(via OpenAI) produced the most visually appealing results,

offered a faster, albeit cringier, alternative.

Final Verdict

The

is a powerful tool for unifying these disparate APIs under a single interface. It allows developers to swap providers easily or build fallback systems when one service goes down. For most web applications, I recommend sticking to

or

for high-volume text tasks and reserving

for complex image generation. Always manage client expectations: API calls are not instant, and they are never 100% reliable.

Laravel AI SDK Benchmark: Performance and Cost Across 5 LLM Providers

Fancy watching it?

Watch the full video and context

3 min read