Artificial Intelligence

The biological imperative of fear versus the logic of abundance Humans possess a hardwired biological programming to scan for existential threats. This survival mechanism, essential for avoiding predators on the savannah, now manifests as modern doomism. Historically, every generation has faced a perceived end-of-the-world scenario, from the biblical great flood to the late 19th-century fertilizer crisis. Before the Haber-Bosch process revolutionized nitrogen production, the world feared mass starvation because guano supplies were dwindling. Technology did not just solve the problem; it fundamentally expanded the carrying capacity of the planet. Today, David Friedberg argues that while AI is viewed as the latest existential threat, the actual data points toward a trajectory of compounding prosperity. We are currently witnessing the digitization of the physical world. This process allows for precise predictions and engineering at the molecular and celestial scales. While the West, particularly the United States, often feels a sense of stagnation or loss—partially due to the immense success already achieved—the East is rapidly embracing these shifts. In China, for instance, the rapid rise in GDP per capita has fostered a culture that views technology as a net gain rather than a threat to the social order. The psychological hurdle for the West is a transition from a mindset of protectionism to one of radical agency. Democratizing the tools of superintelligence A common fear regarding AI is the centralization of power within a small class of "trillionaires." However, technological history suggests a different path: diffusion and commoditization. Early fears that Cisco would control the world because they owned the switches of the internet proved unfounded. Technology always finds its way to the edge. We are already seeing the move away from dependency on massive cloud data centers. Open-source models can now be run on local hardware, enabling individuals to create value without a corporate intermediary. This shift extends into physical Robotics. The vision for the future isn't one where corporations own all the robots to replace labor, but where every individual owns a robot in their garage. This "robot employee" can operate 24 hours a day, performing manufacturing, packaging, and shipping for a small business. Much like Etsy allowed millions to monetize hobbies, personal robotics will allow individuals to compete at scale. The bottleneck is no longer the resource or the labor; it is the human spark of agency—the willingness to take ownership of the future rather than waiting for instructions from a traditional employer. Moon factories and the railgun path to Mars While Elon Musk focuses on the habitation of Mars, the economic logistical hub of the solar system will likely be the Moon. The Moon possesses 1/6th of Earth's gravity and no atmosphere, making it the ideal manufacturing base. Launching material from Earth is energy-intensive because rockets must fight atmospheric drag. On the Moon, however, we can utilize "mass drivers"—essentially long electric railguns—to shoot materials into space at escape velocity without chemical propulsion. Lunar soil contains aluminum, silicon, carbon, and ice. By building self-replicating robotic factories on the lunar surface, humanity can manufacture habitat units, heat shields, and fuel components. Shipping these from the Moon to Mars could reduce the energy cost of colonization by a factor of 100. This creates a giant "lunar economy" that functions as the industrial backbone for space exploration. This isn't just about science fiction; it’s about a fundamental shift in resource availability. When raw materials are no longer limited to a closed Earth system, the zero-sum games of global politics begin to dissolve. Solving the magnetic puzzle for infinite energy Fusion has long been the "holy grail" of energy, perpetually ten years away. However, the integration of AI into plasma physics is changing that timeline. The core challenge of fusion is maintaining a stable plasma at 100 million degrees Celsius. Protons naturally repel each other; they must be squeezed by magnetic fields to fuse. These plasmas are inherently unstable and frequently "break" the magnetic bottle. AI is now being used to train the control systems of these magnetic fields in real-time, allowing for record-breaking runs in facilities across the globe. If the cost of energy drops to one cent per kilowatt-hour, the global economy expands exponentially. Desalination becomes trivial, vertical farming becomes standard, and the cost of manufacturing anything drops to near zero because the marginal cost of robotic labor is essentially the cost of the electricity that runs them. We are moving toward a world of "direct energy capture," moving away from the primitive method of spinning steam turbines. This transition marks the end of scarcity-driven conflict. Wars are fought over oil and rare minerals; in a fusion-powered, asteroid-mining world, those drivers of human misery evaporate. The end of aging as a biological inevitability Aging is increasingly being viewed by the scientific community not as a natural phase of life, but as a treatable disease of epigenetic information loss. Every cell in the human body contains the same DNA, but what distinguishes an eye cell from a skin cell are the "switches" (methyl markers) that turn genes on or off. Over time, DNA damage from radiation and toxins causes these markers to shift. The cell loses its identity and function, leading to wrinkles, organ failure, and systemic disease. In 2006, Shinya Yamanaka discovered four proteins (Yamanaka factors) that could reset a cell to its embryonic state. Subsequent research has shown that applying a smaller "dose" of these factors can reset the cell's age without erasing its identity. We have already seen successful age reversal in mice and monkeys, and human clinical trials are currently underway for localized conditions like blindness. Within ten to twenty years, systemic age-reversal treatments—delivered via cocktails or gene-regulating plasmids—will likely enter the market. This creates a "longevity escape velocity," where every year a person lives, science adds more than one year to their life expectancy. This shift will fundamentally rewire our concepts of retirement, career, and family structure. Genetic selection and the competition for potential The most controversial frontier of human agency is the use of CRISPR and embryo selection. While society is generally comfortable with selecting against negative traits like Huntington's disease, the shift toward selecting for positive traits like IQ, immune function, or athletic ability is the next major ethical battleground. Companies like Heliospect (formerly Herasite) are already providing genomic modeling for IVF embryos. The Overton Window on this technology will likely shift through competition. If one segment of the population produces children with significantly higher health spans and cognitive capacities, parents who previously held "luxury beliefs" against genetic selection will feel a moral and competitive imperative to adopt the technology. This isn't just about "designer babies"; it's about giving the next generation the biological resilience to navigate a world of Superintelligence. We have the choice to view AI as something that replaces us or as a "rocket boost" that requires us to upgrade our own biological hardware to keep pace. California as a cautionary tale of social erosion While technology points toward a future of infinite potential, political systems in the West are trending toward stagnation. California serves as a stark example of what happens when a government prioritizes the fulfillment of impossible promises over functional infrastructure. With a pension liability hole estimated between $600 billion and $1 trillion, the state is increasingly desperate for revenue, leading to the proposal of radical policies like a wealth tax. A wealth tax is a fundamental violation of private property rights. Unlike an income tax, it assesses the value of assets already purchased with post-tax dollars. If a government can seize a percentage of your property based on a fluctuating valuation, the foundation of the American experiment is undermined. This creates a "flywheel of decline" where the most productive members of society—the tech leaders and entrepreneurs—flee the state for more hospitable environments like Nevada or Florida. When 51% of the population can vote to seize the property of the other 49%, the system eventually consumes itself. This is the primary tension of the next decade: a clash between the exponential growth of technology and the entropic decay of social and political institutions. Reclaiming a vision of tomorrow In 1955, Disneyland launched Tomorrowland with a vision of radical optimism, featuring "the house of the future" and "rocket to the moon." By the 1970s, that vision had shifted toward dystopia, with rides focusing on robots malfunctioning and space missions veering off course. This mirrors our current cultural malaise. We have become experts at identifying why things will fail, but we have lost the collective muscle for building things that succeed. Prosperity is not an accident; it is the result of productivity growth. Real economic growth comes from mining more material, generating cheaper energy, and creating more efficient ways to grow food. When we rely on money printing to create the illusion of growth, we end up with the high inflation and housing crises that drive people toward socialism. The antidote is a return to agency. We must stop viewing the government as the primary solver of our problems and start viewing ourselves as the architects of a high-technology, high-abundance future. The tools for infinite energy, lunar industrialization, and biological youth are within reach; the only thing standing in the way is the biological instinct to fear the corner we haven't yet turned.