Windows Server 2003

Security theater and the $100 million heist It sounds like a lazy plot point from a low-budget heist movie. You know the scene: the elite hacker approaches the high-security vault, tries the most obvious combination imaginable, and the doors swing open. In the real world, we like to think institutions guarding the world’s most precious treasures are more sophisticated. However, the Louvre proved that even the most prestigious museums can fall victim to the most basic human laziness. An investigation into a high-profile heist at the museum, which saw over $100 million in jewels stolen in broad daylight, revealed a staggering lack of basic digital hygiene. A 2014 audit by the French cybersecurity agency discovered that the password for the entire video surveillance system was LOUVRE in all caps. It wasn't just a one-off mistake; other critical security systems employed equally trivial credentials. This wasn't a case of a single negligent employee, but a systemic failure that persisted for years despite multiple warnings. This discovery shatters the illusion of the ‘fortress museum.’ When we see security guards, lasers, and biometric scanners in media, we assume there is a robust digital backbone supporting them. The reality is often much grimmer. The museum was reportedly running security software purchased in 2003 on Windows Server 2003 platforms that had been end-of-life for a decade. This is the definition of security theater: a visible show of protection that masks a core of utter vulnerability. The psychology of obvious passwords Why does this happen? It comes down to the friction between security and usability. For a museum staff member, a complex, rotating password is an obstacle to getting their job done. LOUVRE is easy to remember, easy to share, and never requires a reset. In large organizations, the path of least resistance often wins. This is particularly true in public-sector or non-profit institutions where IT budgets are perpetually underfunded and the staff may not be tech-savvy. We see this same pattern in consumer electronics and small businesses. People still use ‘password123’ or their pet’s name because the perceived risk of a breach feels lower than the daily annoyance of managing a secure credential. The Louvre case serves as a massive, $100 million reminder that the ‘it won’t happen to me’ mentality is a dangerous delusion. YouTube’s membership bugs and the war on friction While the Louvre was struggling with basic passwords, YouTube spent the week struggling with its own user experience. Several users reported being hit with unavoidable pop-up ads for channel memberships that had to be manually closed before a video would even start playing. For a platform that already bombards users with pre-roll, mid-roll, and post-roll ads, this felt like an escalation in the war on the viewer’s attention. The situation was particularly galling for creators like Linus Media Group, who had intentionally disabled YouTube Memberships to drive their audience toward their own independent platform, Floatplane. Despite turning the feature off, the bug forced YouTube to continue harassing viewers to join a membership that didn’t even exist as an option. YouTube eventually claimed this was a bug rather than an intentional feature rollout, but it highlights a growing trend in the tech industry: the move toward ‘dark patterns’ that force monetization at the cost of the user experience. When a platform becomes so desperate for conversion that it interrupts the very content the user came for, it risks permanent brand damage. The core values of the audience-first creator In the creator space, this leads to a fundamental question: who are you really working for? For some, the answer is the platform algorithm. For Linus Media Group, the internal mantra is ‘the audience is our guide.’ This means listening to the friction points viewers report. If the audience says YouTube Memberships are intrusive and annoying, a creator has a choice: take the revenue and ignore the complaint, or kill the feature to preserve the relationship. Choosing the latter is a significant financial sacrifice. Disabling memberships can cost tens of thousands of dollars in annual recurring revenue. However, in the long term, the trust of the audience is a more valuable currency. Once you lose the trust of the person behind the screen, no amount of pop-up ads will bring them back. The airport electronics ban that wasn’t Travel has always been a point of high friction for technology enthusiasts. Between battery regulations and weight limits, flying with a desktop PC or specialized gear is an exercise in patience. But Air Canada took this to a new level when a supervisor allegedly attempted to ban all electronic devices from checked luggage. The incident involved a traveler being told they could not check a desktop computer because it was an ‘electronic.’ When the traveler pointed out that the regulations specifically mention lithium batteries—which a desktop PC lacks—the supervisor reportedly doubled down, eventually throwing the traveler’s passport onto the counter. This highlights a massive education gap in the airline industry. While lithium-ion batteries are a genuine safety hazard in cargo holds due to their potential for thermal runaway, a circuit board and a power supply are no more dangerous than a toaster. When airline staff lack the technical literacy to distinguish between a fire hazard and a harmless piece of hardware, the passenger is the one who pays the price in stress and delays. China’s CCC certification and the battery crackdown This isn't just a North American problem. China has recently implemented the CCC (China Compulsory Certificate) for lithium battery products, including power banks. The regulation is strictly enforced for domestic flights and trains. If your power bank doesn’t have the specific CCC stamp on the exterior, it is confiscated by security. The inconsistency of these rules is what makes them so frustrating. You can fly into China with a non-CCC battery on an international flight, but you cannot take that same battery on a one-hour domestic hop from Shanghai to Beijing. This effectively renders millions of perfectly safe, high-quality international power banks as e-waste for anyone traveling within the country. The decade-old Windows bug finally dies In a rare win for common sense, Microsoft has finally addressed a bug that has plagued Windows for ten years: the ‘Update and Shutdown’ command that actually results in a restart. For a decade, users would select ‘Shutdown’ to let their PC finish updates while they went to bed, only to wake up the next morning and find the computer running, having rebooted itself after the update finished. It is almost impressive that a bug so central to the user experience could survive for multiple versions of an operating system. It points to the fragmented way large software companies handle feedback. Microsoft is currently more focused on integrating AI features than fixing the core plumbing of the OS. The AI power crisis This focus on AI is hitting a physical wall: power. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have both warned that the biggest bottleneck for AI isn't the supply of Nvidia chips, but the availability of electricity. Data centers are consuming so much power that they are driving up consumer electricity bills by as much as 36% in some regions. The solution, according to the tech giants, is nuclear. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are all exploring or funding small modular nuclear reactors to power their server farms. We are entering an era where big tech isn't just a software provider, but a utility company. If they can’t find the power on the grid, they will simply build their own grid. Conclusion From the Louvre’s ‘LOUVRE’ password to the global race for nuclear-powered AI, the recurring theme of the modern tech landscape is a disconnect between expectation and reality. We expect the world’s greatest museum to have the world’s greatest security, just as we expect Windows to shut down when we tell it to. As technology becomes more complex, these basic failures become more visible. The future of consumer electronics and enterprise security won’t be won by the most advanced AI or the most expensive software. It will be won by the organizations that get the fundamentals right: secure passwords, honest user experiences, and technical literacy at every level of the staff. Until then, we will continue to see $100 million heists and ten-year-old bugs defining our digital lives.