Paul Patterson

The end of digital ownership and the rise of the rent-everything model Ubisoft recently sparked a firestorm in the gaming community when Philippe Tremblay, the director of subscriptions, suggested that gamers need to start getting "comfortable not owning their games." This sentiment reflects a broader industry shift toward the "Software as a Service" (SaaS) model, which has already claimed music and film through platforms like Spotify and Netflix. While Ubisoft attempts to frame this as a natural evolution similar to the transition from CDs to streaming, the comparison falls apart under scrutiny. When you stop paying for Spotify, you lose access to a library of millions of songs that are largely interchangeable between services. When a gaming giant shuts down the servers for a title you "purchased," the loss is absolute and irrecoverable. The history of the Ubisoft launcher—transitioning from the Ubisoft Game Launcher to Uplay, and finally Ubisoft Connect—highlights a company more focused on rebranding its gateways than ensuring long-term product stability. Philippe Tremblay argues that consumers should feel secure knowing their save files and progress are stored in the cloud. However, Ubisoft has a documented history of decommissioning online services for older titles, including entries in the Assassin's Creed and Far Cry franchises. This creates a paradox: the industry wants the consumer's trust while simultaneously proving that their digital "purchases" have an expiration date determined solely by a corporate balance sheet. Baldur's Gate 3 developer warns against subscription monopolies In stark contrast to Ubisoft, Swen Vincke, the founder of Larian Studios, has taken a public stand against the subscription-dominant future. Vincke argues that if a select group of platform holders gains the power to decide what goes to market based on subscription metrics, the very nature of game development will change—and not for the better. Subscription models naturally favor content that can predictably retain subscribers over many hours, often leading to "engagement-focused" design over artistic or idealistic pursuits. Baldur's Gate 3 stands as a monument to what is possible when a developer is not beholden to the metrics of a service like Xbox Game Pass or Ubisoft Plus. By focusing on a high-quality, standalone purchase, Larian Studios was able to take risks that a subscription-focused board might have deemed too complex or niche. Vincke maintains that direct distribution from developer to player is the only way to ensure the survival of creative idealism in the industry. If the primary ecosystems all shift to subscriptions, discoverability will become even more savage, and the preference of the service provider will ultimately determine which games get made. SSD shortages and the hidden cost of production cuts While the software side of tech is fighting over ownership, the hardware side is facing a looming supply crisis. After a year of record-low demand in 2023, makers of 3D NAND drastically cut production to stabilize prices. This strategy has worked too well. As Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) begin scaling up purchases for the next generation of devices, the market is facing a severe shortage. High-capacity SSDs are projected to see price spikes of 15% to 20% in the immediate future, with some analysts warning of increases up to 50% as the supply chain lag catches up to retail. This cyclical nature of the tech market serves as a warning for builders and consumers. The "just-in-time" manufacturing model means that any sudden shift in demand leads to massive price volatility. For those planning PC builds or server upgrades, the window for "cheap storage" is rapidly closing. While storage prices generally trend downward over decades, the short-term fluctuations can be devastating for those on a budget. This serves as a reminder that even as we move toward a world where we "own nothing," the physical infrastructure required to run those services remains subject to the harsh realities of global manufacturing and supply chain management. The decline of search engines and the SEO arms race A recent study from German researchers has confirmed what many users have felt for years: search engines are getting worse. Across Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo, there is a measurable downward trend in the quality of search results, particularly for product reviews. This is driven by an explosion of SEO spam, which has been supercharged by the advent of generative AI. Google has historically been the best at mitigating these issues, but their lead is shrinking as spammers find more sophisticated ways to hijack the algorithm. Lily Ray, a senior executive at Amsive Digital, notes that we are currently experiencing some of the worst search results in history. Part of this is due to an increased emphasis on user-generated content (UGC). While intended to provide more "authentic" results, this has created a massive opening for scammers to infiltrate platforms like Reddit with bot-driven narratives. As the written web becomes increasingly monetized through listicles and AI-generated filler, the incentive to create deep, authoritative content is disappearing. If there is no money in quality written content, the web will continue its slide into a mess of ads and misinformation. Corporate culpability and the Fujitsu Post Office scandal Technological failure has real-world consequences that go far beyond slow loading times or expensive storage. In the United Kingdom, Fujitsu has finally admitted "moral culpability" in what is being called the most widespread miscarriage of justice in British history. Between 1999 and 2015, over 700 sub-postmasters were wrongfully convicted of theft and fraud based on discrepancies found in Fujitsu's Horizon accounting software. Despite internal knowledge that the software was flawed, the Post Office and Fujitsu continued to use the data to prosecute innocent people, leading to bankruptcies, prison sentences, and at least four suicides. Paul Patterson, the European head of Fujitsu, has acknowledged a moral obligation to contribute to the financial compensation of the victims. However, the company is still waiting for a judge to determine their specific share of the settlement. This case highlights the dangerous lack of accountability when government institutions and massive tech corporations collaborate. When a software bug is treated as an infallible truth in a courtroom, the human cost is catastrophic. This serves as a grim reminder that as we cede more control to automated systems and opaque software, the mechanisms for challenging those systems must be robust and accessible. Future outlook for consumer electronics and user rights The trends of early 2024 point toward a tightening of corporate control over the user experience. Whether it is Apple making it nearly impossible to cancel Apple Arcade without specific hardware, or Haier threatening legal action against open-source developers for Home Assistant integrations, the walls of the "walled garden" are getting higher. The rise of AI in devices like Alexa and the Apple Vision Pro promises more convenience, but often at the cost of ownership and interoperability. To navigate this landscape, consumers must become more discerning. Supporting companies that prioritize direct ownership and open standards is no longer just a niche preference—it is a survival strategy for the digital age. As hardware prices fluctuate and software moves to the cloud, the value of a physical backup and a standalone license has never been higher. The tech world is moving fast, but as the Fujitsu scandal and the Ubisoft outcry show, the human element remains the most important factor in the equation.