The chemistry of the dry cup Astringency remains one of the most polarizing sensations in the specialty coffee world. Enthusiasts and professionals often describe it as a sandpaper-like dryness on the tongue, yet its chemical origin in coffee has been shrouded in myth for decades. Unlike wine or tea, where the presence of tannins provides a clear explanation for this mouth-puckering effect, coffee follows a different biological path. Understanding this phenomenon requires separating physical touch from taste perception. Debunking the tannin myth in coffee A persistent misconception in coffee shops and competition stages is that coffee contains tannins similar to red wine. Dr. Samo Smrke, a chemist at the Zurich University of Applied Sciences, explicitly rejects this notion. Coffee lacks the significant amounts of polymeric polyphenols—specifically those with enough hydroxyl groups—to precipitate proteins in the same way wine does. While coffee contains chlorogenic acid, these compounds do not function like traditional tannins. Therefore, the "dryness" drinkers experience must stem from an entirely different molecular structure. Brianne Linne identifies the melanoidin connection Recent research by Dr. Brianne Linne at Ohio State University has shifted the focus toward melanoidins. These nitrogenous brown polymers, formed during the Maillard reaction, are what give coffee its color. Through a fractionation process, Linne isolated a specific subset of small-scale melanoidins that carry phenolic compounds. These structures essentially block lubricating saliva, creating the friction we perceive as dryness. This discovery explains why both light and dark roasts can be astringent: light roasts possess high levels of precursor chlorogenic acids, while dark roasts produce more complex melanoidin structures that can harbor these drying phenolics. Practical implications for brewing extraction This scientific shift has direct consequences for how we dial in a brew. Because these astringent-carrying melanoidins extract relatively slowly, pushing extraction too far—a common goal among those seeking high yields—often invites dryness. Lance Hedrick suggests that the "extraction ceiling" for light roasts is likely lower than previously thought. If a cup feels physically abrasive, the solution isn't necessarily to fix a flavor imbalance, but to physically reduce the amount of these late-extracting compounds by lowering the water temperature or shortening the brew ratio. The future of coffee science While the melanoidin theory provides the most robust explanation to date, other factors may contribute. Dr. Jonathan Gagne has previously theorized that micro-particles or "fines" could mechanically cause a sensation of dryness. While unproven, using thicker paper filters to remove these particles often yields a smoother cup. As research continues, the coffee community is moving away from vague descriptors and toward a precise, chemical understanding of how roasting and brewing interact to create the perfect mouthfeel.
Jonathan Gagné
People
- May 9, 2026
- Apr 14, 2026
- Jan 30, 2026
- Sep 18, 2025
- Jun 27, 2025
The Physics of Extraction: Immersion and Percolation Most home brewers start their journey with a French Press, drawn by its simplicity. Yet, the divide between immersion and percolation is more than just a difference in hardware; it is a fundamental shift in fluid dynamics. Immersion involves soaking coffee grounds in a static pool of water, whereas percolation, typically seen in a V60 or Chemex, relies on water passing through a bed of coffee. The latter is inherently more efficient. As water moves through the coffee bed in a percolation setup, it continuously introduces fresh solvent. This prevents the liquid from reaching a state of chemical equilibrium too early. In contrast, immersion brewing sees the water become saturated with solubles quickly, which then slows the remaining extraction process. Even after four minutes of steeping, an immersion brew often struggles to match the extraction yield of a standard pour-over because the solvent's "pulling power" diminishes as it fills with coffee solids. Quantifying the Yield: Light vs. Dark Roasts Experimental data reveals a stark contrast in how different roast profiles react to these methods. When testing ultra-lightly roasted Kenya coffee, the immersion method significantly underperformed, yielding an extraction of only 16%. In the same conditions, a V60 using a multi-pour technique reached a 21.12% extraction yield. This suggests that for dense, light-roast beans, the constant replenishment of water in percolation is necessary to pull out the desired sweetness and acidity. Darker roasts tell a different story. These beans are more porous and soluble, making them less "volatile" in various brewing environments. While the V60 still produced a higher extraction (19.86% vs 17.08% for the press), the flavor profile gap narrowed. If you prefer the heavy, oil-rich body of a dark roast, the lower extraction of a French Press might actually be preferable, as it avoids the astringent properties that can emerge when pushing dark beans too far in a percolation setting. The AeroPress: A Hybrid Contender The AeroPress occupies a unique middle ground. It allows for a full immersion phase, yet finishes with a pressurized percolation phase. This hybrid nature makes it one of the most versatile tools in consumer tech. By pushing water through the puck, you achieve emulsification and a higher concentration of oils than a standard paper filter pour-over, though it requires a delicate touch. Pressing too hard can introduce bitterness, proving that even with a hybrid device, technique remains paramount. Final Verdict: Choosing Your Daily Driver If ease of use is your primary metric, the French Press remains the gold standard. It offers a balanced, "blendy" cup with zero fuss. However, for those chasing clarity, floral notes, and high extraction potential, the V60 is the superior instrument. It demands more skill—managing agitation and pour cycles—but rewards the user with a cleaner, more vibrant result. Ultimately, your choice should reflect whether you value the tactile grit of a full-bodied immersion or the surgical precision of percolation.
Jun 13, 2025Many coffee enthusiasts fall into the trap of believing a new, shiny brewer will solve their extraction woes. They chase different geometries, hoping a flat bottom or a specific cone angle will magically produce the perfect cup. However, the brewer is actually the final piece of a much more complex puzzle. After traveling across Europe and brewing at various bars, I’ve found that the real mastery of coffee comes from controlling the three variables that actually dictate flavor: water chemistry, filter quality, and grind technique. The Invisible 98%: Managing Water Chemistry Your coffee is over 98% water. If you use tap water with high mineral content—often reaching 300 or 400 parts per million—you are effectively masking the delicate florals and aromatics of expensive beans. Hard water, packed with calcium and bicarbonates, mutes acidity and leaves your coffee tasting like chalk or ash. While a standard Brita filter helps with chlorine, it doesn't solve the mineral problem. To truly unlock a coffee's potential, you need a "dump and go" solution like Third Wave Water or a ZeroWater pitcher. These systems strip the water down to near-zero PPM, allowing you to remineralize it to a specific target—ideally around 50 to 60 PPM for a balanced, vibrant cup. Why Filter Paper is the Ultimate Bottleneck It’s common to see shops using high-end gear while relying on subpar Hario tabbed filters. These papers often cause slow draw-downs and clogging, which leads to over-extraction and a bitter finish. In a side-by-side test, the Cafec T90 filter finished a brew 30 seconds faster than the standard Hario paper, yet it extracted more efficiently. Higher-quality papers like those from Sibarist or Cafec offer better porosity and fiber consistency. This prevents the "muddy" texture often found in cheaper filters and ensures the water flows evenly through the grounds rather than stalling. Hacking Your Grinder Performance You don't need a $3,000 grinder to improve your results. The secret lies in "slow feeding." By tilting a hand grinder parallel to the ground or trickling beans into an electric hopper one by one, you reduce the production of "fines"—micro-particles that clog filters and cause bitterness. This simple change in technique alters the particle size distribution, creating a cleaner cup without a hardware upgrade. Even a world-class Mahlkönig EK43 will fail if it's misaligned and producing lopsided grounds. Focus on technique and maintenance before reaching for your wallet. Matching the Roaster's Profile There is no such thing as a perfect, universal water recipe. Every roaster develops their coffee based on the specific water chemistry in their facility. To get the best results, try to replicate the roaster’s environment. If they use soft water, aim for a low-bicarbonate profile at home. By focusing on these fundamental pillars rather than chasing the next trendy brewer, you’ll find a level of consistency that expensive gadgets simply cannot provide.
Mar 12, 2025Beyond the Espresso Myth For two decades, the Aeropress has dominated the travel brewing scene. Many users treat it like a manual espresso machine, applying maximum force to the plunger to mimic high-pressure extraction. This is a mistake. High-pressure plunging forces undissolved solids and colloids through the filter, resulting in a cup that is muddy, bitter, and astringent. To achieve professional-grade clarity, you must abandon the heavy-handed approach. Use the weight of your hand alone. A slow, steady press lasting approximately 45 to 60 seconds transforms the coffee bed into its own filtration unit, catching the "fines" that would otherwise ruin the texture of your brew. The Essential Gear To execute this refined method, you need a standard Aeropress (non-inverted), a reliable burr grinder, and a digital scale. While the Aeropress is forgiving, precision in the water-to-coffee ratio is the only way to replicate results. I recommend 15 grams of coffee to 250 grams of water. Aim for water temperatures between 80°C and 95°C; boiling water is often too aggressive for the immersion nature of this device. Mastering the Bloom and Extraction Standard brewing often results in "bypass"—water that leaks through the filter before the grounds are fully saturated. This liquid is weak and under-extracted. By implementing a 45-second bloom with twice the weight of the coffee in water, you de-gas the grounds and prepare them for efficient diffusion. After the bloom, pour the remaining water and immediately insert the plunger to create a vacuum seal. This stop-and-go method ensures every drop of water works to extract flavor rather than simply draining through. The Case for Coarser Grinds Conventional wisdom suggests a fine, salt-like grind for the Aeropress. However, going coarser—closer to a medium drip setting—promotes a more even flow through the coffee puck. This reduces the risk of channeling and harshness. If your coffee feels one-dimensional or overly bitter, move your grinder two or three clicks coarser. You will find the resulting cup much more "sparkling" and clean, akin to a high-end pour-over but with the superior body only an immersion brewer can provide. Troubleshooting for Taste If the final cup lacks punch, extend the total immersion time to three minutes before pressing. Coffee doesn't over-extract quickly in an immersion environment once the initial solubility peak is reached. Conversely, if you notice a dry, sandpaper-like feeling on your tongue, lower your water temperature or press even slower. The goal is a juicy, balanced cup that highlights the bean's origin rather than the brewer's force.
Nov 20, 2024The Flaw in Conventional Brewing Logic Many coffee enthusiasts struggle with inconsistency despite following rigid recipes. They grind finer, use boiling water, and push for high ratios, yet end up with a bitter, astringent mess. This frustration stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of fluid dynamics within a dripper. Even Matt Winton, the 2021 World Brewers Cup champion, admitted to facing these hurdles. The problem isn't just the coffee; it's how the water interacts with the filter and the brewer's walls. The Theory of Contact Points Water flow in a pour-over isn't uniform. The concept of **contact points** explains that water travels most efficiently where the filter touches the brewer's surface and then immediately breaks away. Purely flat surfaces cause the paper to seal, choking flow. Conversely, total lack of contact slows movement. The sweet spot exists in the capillary flow created by ridges or mesh. In a Kono dripper, the flat upper walls prevent bypass while the bottom ridges create specific contact points to drive extraction. This "touching, not touching" rhythm dictates the speed and evenness of your brew. Engineering Evenness: The Booster To solve the issue of clogging and channeling, Winton collaborated with Sibarist to create the Booster. This device introduces hundreds of micro-contact points at the base of the brewer. By preventing the paper from sealing against the flat bottom of drippers like the Orea, it ensures water moves vertically through the entire coffee bed rather than searching for a single exit hole. The result is a more transparent flavor profile and a significant reduction in the harshness often found in uneven extractions. Tailoring Extraction to Processing Understanding flow dynamics allows for strategic brewing. For clean, washed coffees, a high-extraction approach works wonders: 98°C water, fine grinds, and a 1:17 ratio with a Booster to maintain flow. However, natural or anaerobically processed coffees require restraint. Pushing these to 22% extraction often mutes their complexity. For these, Winton suggests a lower extraction (18-19%) to preserve sweetness and prevent the "muddy" profile that plagues over-processed beans. Practical Implications for the Home Barista While high-end gear like the XBloom provides automation, the core lesson is manual. You don't necessarily need expensive accessories; even a simple metal mesh at the bottom of a flat-bed brewer can drastically improve consistency. By manipulating contact points, you reclaim control over the draw-down time and flavor clarity. The goal isn't just a high extraction—it's a deliberate one.
Sep 26, 2024The consumer coffee landscape mirrors the trajectory of high-end audio or PC building. What was once a simple choice between a few standard devices has fractured into an overwhelming array of specialized hardware. This explosion in the dripper market often leaves enthusiasts chasing the next "perfect" extraction, but a technical breakdown of the mechanics reveals that most innovations are variations on core structural themes. Percolation vs. Immersion Dynamics The fundamental divide in coffee brewing lies between percolation and immersion. Percolation devices, like the Hario V60, rely on fresh water continuously passing through the coffee bed, favoring high clarity and vibrant acidity. Conversely, immersion methods like the French Press allow grounds to steep, resulting in a heavier body and more textured mouthfeel. Modern hybrid devices, such as the Hario Switch or Fellow Stag X, attempt to bridge this gap by using valves to control contact time, allowing for a concentrated immersion bloom followed by a percolation drawdown. The Geometry Debate: Cones vs. Flat Bottoms Geometry dictates the path of the water and the evenness of the extraction. While flat-bottom brewers like the Kalita Wave are often touted for their consistency, simulation data suggests that conical brewers actually offer a higher potential for total extraction evenness when bypass is eliminated. Flat-bottom designs tend to over-extract the top layer of the bed while under-extracting the bottom. However, for most users, the Hario V60 remains the gold standard for workflow and clarity, provided the user manages the inherent bypass effectively. Beyond the Brewer: The Filter Factor Hardware is only half the battle. The porosity and thickness of paper filters often impact the final cup more than the dripper's shape. Thicker filters, such as those from Cafec, can slow down fast-draining coffees and trap more fines, significantly altering the body. Before investing in yet another dripper, enthusiasts should experiment with variable water temperatures, grind feed rates, and filter types to maximize the potential of their existing gear. Practical Market Outlook While specialized tools like the Next Level Pulsar or the Orea V4 offer fun experimentation for the hobbyist, they rarely revolutionize the cup quality for the average consumer. Most brewing goals are achievable with a standard conical dripper and a versatile immersion tool like the AeroPress. Buying better beans consistently yields a higher return on investment than accumulating redundant plastic and ceramic brewers.
Jun 6, 2024Beyond the Marketing: The Seasoning Debate Most home baristas view a brand-new coffee grinder as a precision instrument ready for peak performance out of the box. This assumption is a mistake. Seasoning—the process of running several kilograms of coffee through new burrs—remains a polarizing topic. While skeptics dismiss it as a waste of beans, the physical reality of metallurgy and particle distribution tells a different story. New burrs are often too sharp, causing aggressive fractures that produce excessive fines. Quantifying the Shift in Particle Distribution Data from Dr. Mark Al-Shemmeri provides a clear picture of what happens during the first 20kg of a grinder's life. Testing the Mahlkönig EK43, Al-Shemmeri observed a drastic reduction in fines and a shift in the median particle peak toward a coarser profile at the same setting. The burrs don't just 'get oily'; they physically dull from an unstable sharpness to a consistent, long-term edge. Without this stabilization, users face constant 'setting drift' where they must adjust their grind daily as the burrs naturally wear in. Burrs and Variability Geometry dictates the necessity of seasoning. Large flat burrs, like those in the DF83, show significantly more volatility than small conical burrs. Jonathan Gagne previously noted similar effects on high-end equipment like the Monolith EG-1. If you ignore this phase, you are effectively reviewing or using a prototype of your grinder’s actual performance. Strategic Seasoning for the Home User Don't burn out your motor in a single afternoon. Use cheap, dark-roasted beans—which are less dense and easier to crush—to season the burrs. Maintain the duty cycle to prevent overheating and ensure proper ventilation. Proper seasoning turns a volatile tool into a consistent companion, ensuring your espresso shots don't change recipes every morning.
Mar 31, 2024A Pivot from the Lecture Hall Ten years ago, Lance Hedrick didn't envision a career defined by extraction yields. He was deep in academia, pursuing a Master's degree while working as a graduate assistant. Needing a flexible gig to fund his studies, he stepped behind a bar in Arkansas. At the time, the shop served dark-roasted commodity coffee, a far cry from the nuanced specialty beans that would later define his life. What began as a paycheck quickly transformed into a fascination with latte art, as he poured over milk textures under the guidance of mentor Zach Kelly. The Catalyst of Specialty Coffee The turning point arrived with a single cup of Ethiopia Guji Halu Beriti from Onyx Coffee Lab. The complex, naturally processed profile shattered his perception of the beverage. Hedrick abandoned his PhD path, choosing instead to dive headfirst into the "nerdy" mechanics of espresso. He consumed every piece of literature from Barista Hustle and Scott Rao, eventually rising to head trainer before joining Onyx officially in 2018. Competitive Rigor and Scientific Collaboration Credibility in the coffee world is often forged on the competition stage. Hedrick secured second and third place finishes at the United States Brewers Cup, using these platforms to experiment with mesh filtration and fines removal. This drive for precision led him to collaborate with experts like astrophysicist Jonathan Gagne and chemist Christopher Hendon. These partnerships ensure his content remains grounded in modern data rather than mere speculation. Democratizing Education and Refusing Influence Hedrick launched his YouTube channel in 2021 with a mission to dismantle the gatekeeping prevalent in professional coffee training. By offering high-level curriculum for free, he aimed to help baristas secure raises and promotions. To maintain this integrity, he adheres to a strict code: no paid reviews and no distributor previews. By following his own "dopamine"—from 70-year-old lever machines to data-heavy grinder tests—he provides a transparent, ADHD-fueled look into what truly makes coffee great.
Mar 12, 2024The Hidden Struggle for Extraction Equilibrium Brewing exceptional espresso requires more than high-end machinery; it demands a surgical understanding of fluid dynamics within the coffee bed. Most enthusiasts take the shower screen and dispersion block for granted, assuming these components deliver a uniform sheet of water. However, rigorous data suggests our current equipment is fundamentally flawed. Water is chaotic, particularly when forced through a compacted bed of particles ranging from one to three hundred microns. This chaos creates an inherent bias toward center-focused flow, leaving the edges of the puck neglected and underextracted. The Cookie Cutter Revelation Significant research into radial extraction uniformity has exposed a startling discrepancy between the center and the perimeter of the basket. Stéphane Ribes pioneered the "cookie cutter" method, physically separating the center of a spent puck from its outer ring to measure remaining solubles. The findings were undeniable: the center is consistently the most extracted region. While a 14% extraction at the edge might seem like a minor margin, that perimeter represents roughly 30% of the puck's total mass. When the center is extracting at 22% and the edges at 14%, you aren't just losing flavor; you're creating a muddled, imbalanced profile. Precision Hardware and Flow Dynamics Modern solutions like Puck Screens and high-flow baskets are shifting the goalposts. Experiments by Rohan Bhattacharya show that these screens act as a secondary dispersion layer, forcing water toward the edges where it normally struggles to penetrate. Furthermore, the rise of "turbo shots"—high-flow, lower-pressure extractions—has proven to be a natural equalizer. High flow rates during the headspace filling phase, as measured by Mike Lipino using specialized 3D-printed flow meters, reduce the time water has to find paths of least resistance, resulting in a more holistic saturation of the coffee bed. Redefining the Extraction Blueprint We are entering an era where traditional ratios and time limits are becoming obsolete. If you utilize a modern, high-precision basket where the hole pattern extends to the very edge, you cannot pull a shot using the same parameters as a traditional VST basket. These tools unlock a different game. Because the edges are no longer lagging behind, you can achieve a balanced 21% extraction across the entire puck in less time. The goal isn't just higher numbers; it's the elimination of the stratification that ruins clarity. By embracing faster fill rates and improved dispersion hardware, we move closer to a consistent, repeatable, and superior cup.
Mar 2, 2024Two years after my first deep dive into the Decent Espresso Machine, the landscape of home extraction has shifted. What was once a lone wolf in the world of high-tech brewing now faces a growing pack of competitors. From the Meticulous robotic lever to the Unica Pro, the market is finally catching up to the vision John Buckman pioneered. Yet, despite the influx of new hardware, the Decent remains a unique proposition for the data-driven barista. The Power of Dynamic Thermal Control Most high-end machines brag about thermal stability, but the Decent offers something far more sophisticated: dynamic thermal control. While a La Marzocco excels at holding a single temperature, the Decent allows you to manipulate heat throughout the shot. You can start a shot at 93°C and force a rapid drop to 70°C to mitigate bitterness in the tail end of extraction. This is possible because of an inlet pipe located just before the group head that mixes cool water with hot water on the fly. Other machines are essentially at the mercy of their boiler's thermal mass; they can't shed heat quickly enough to perform these maneuvers. This decoupling of temperature from static boiler settings represents a level of granular control that few competitors can replicate even in 2023. Software Struggles and Hardware Noise Full digital control comes with digital headaches. The "elephant in the room" remains the tablet interface and the Bluetooth connectivity. Relying on a tablet for every function introduces friction that traditional lever or button-operated machines avoid. I have faced issues ranging from dead Bluetooth chips to software updates that can take an hour—usually at the exact moment you want your morning caffeine. Then there is the sound. The Decent utilizes a vibratory pump that is unapologetically loud. While you can learn to interpret the state of your shot by the rhythmic buzzing of the pump, it lacks the premium, near-silent operation of a rotary pump found in machines like the Linea Micra. For some, this industrial noise is a dealbreaker in a home kitchen environment. The Consistency Conundrum During high-volume testing—specifically when pulling hundreds of shots for research—I noticed a frustrating variance in shot times on the Decent. Even with identical grind sizes and meticulous puck preparation using WDT, shot times fluctuated significantly. In contrast, the Linea Micra stayed within a tight one-to-two-second window. This inconsistency seems tied to how the machine handles low flow rates. When shunting flow on a flash-heating system like this two-meter coil, the water can overheat, creating steam pockets that disrupt flow stability. While John Buckman and the Decent team are constantly iterating on dispersion plates and software calibrations to fix these issues, it highlights the complexity of managing a machine that is essentially a high-speed computer controlling a water heater. A Community Without Equal The real value of owning a Decent isn't just the hardware; it's the access to the most advanced coffee hive-mind on the planet. Between the Basecamp forums and the Espresso Aficionado Discord, the sheer volume of shared profiles is staggering. If you want to replicate a Slayer-style shot or a Londinium lever profile, you simply download the file and hit go. Pioneers like Dr. Jonathan Gagne have even developed adaptive profiles that adjust flow in real-time based on puck resistance, effectively saving shots that would be ruined on a standard machine. Final Verdict Is the Decent still the king of home espresso in 2023? If you crave data, experimentation, and the ability to share recipes globally, the answer is a resounding yes. It remains the most versatile tool for understanding what actually happens inside a portafilter. However, if you want a quiet, tactile, and rock-solid consistent experience without needing to reboot your coffee maker, you might find more joy in a traditional lever machine.
Aug 16, 2023The Flaw in Prescription Recipes Many home brewers chase the perfect cup by mimicking the exact variables of world-class baristas. They buy the same Hario V60 and use the same gram-for-gram recipes, only to find the results muddled or inconsistent. The reality is that formulaic recipes rarely translate across different environments. Your water quality, specifically mineral hardness, acts as a primary variable that dictates extraction speed. Furthermore, grinder alignment and manufacturing tolerances mean your "setting 20" is fundamentally different from mine. Most high-extraction recipes fail because they demand elite-tier grinders that produce narrow particle distributions. When average grinders attempt these fine settings, they produce excessive fines that cause channeling and bitterness. To combat this, smart brewing strategies must move toward methods that tolerate coarser grinds while maintaining high efficiency. Percolation vs. Immersion: A Solvent Battle Understanding the mechanics of extraction requires looking at how water interacts with coffee. In percolation, such as a standard Chemex, you constantly introduce clean solvent. This is highly efficient because fresh water has the highest potential to pull solubles from the grounds. However, it is prone to unevenness; water naturally finds the path of least resistance, creating channels that over-extract some grounds while leaving others under-extracted. Immersion brewing, like a French Press, is the opposite. The water sits with the grounds, extracting "coffee with coffee." As the water becomes saturated, its solvent power decreases, making the process slower but remarkably even. While immersion is more forgiving of poor grind quality, it often lacks the vibrant acidity and clarity found in top-tier percolation brews. The Rise of Percolative Immersion The most exciting development in modern coffee tech is the marriage of these two methods. By using a device with a valve, like the Hario Switch or the Next Level Pulsar, you can steep the coffee to ensure even saturation and then release it for a final percolation phase. This hybrid approach allows you to use much coarser grounds. Coarser grounds are more uniform across almost every grinder on the market, from entry-level hand grinders to professional flat-burr machines. By grinding coarse, you reduce the risk of bitterness and clogging. The initial immersion phase ensures every particle is fully saturated, and the subsequent percolation phase "rinses" the remaining sugars and acids out of the coffee, giving you the body of a French press with the clarity of a pour-over. Hardware Innovations: Switch and Pulsar The Hario Switch has become a staple because of its versatility. You can seat various drippers on its base, including the Kono or even a Fellow Stag X, to customize the bypass and thermal properties. The Kono is particularly effective here because its lack of full-length ribs reduces bypass, forcing more water through the coffee bed during the percolation stage. Meanwhile, the Next Level Pulsar—developed in collaboration with Jonathan Gagne—represents the zero-bypass evolution of this concept. Unlike the Switch, which still allows some water to escape around the filter, the Pulsar forces every drop through the bed. This allows for even coarser grinds—some exceeding 1,000 microns—while still achieving extraction yields of 20% to 22%. Practical Application for the Home Brewer You don't need a massive gear collection to implement these principles. If you use a Clever Dripper, try pouring the water first and then adding the coffee to prevent fines from clogging the filter immediately. If you're struggling with a standard V60, consider switching to a hybrid method that incorporates a steep phase. Ultimately, the goal is to reduce the number of ways a brew can go wrong. By moving toward coarse-grind hybrid brewing, you eliminate the need for precision pouring techniques and expensive grinders. You get a repeatable, sweet, and vibrant cup that works with the gear you already own.
Jun 16, 2023