Johnny Anomaly

The Psychological Evolution of Our Existential Anxiety Humans carry a biological blueprint designed for survival in a world of immediate physical threats. As David Friedberg observes, our brains are ancient hardware trying to process futuristic software. This mismatch creates a perennial state of alarm. Historically, we channeled this fear into prophecies of great floods, plagues, or the Malthusian catastrophe of total starvation. In the late 19th century, the world faced a genuine nitrogen crisis; fertilizer supplies from South American guano fields were vanishing. The predicted end of humanity was averted not by fear, but by the Haber-Bosch process, which synthesized nitrogen from the air. This cycle repeats: a terrifying existential threat emerges, and human ingenuity develops a tool that not only solves the problem but triggers an exponential leap in prosperity. Today, Artificial Intelligence is the modern plague or flood. It feels overwhelming because it challenges the last bastion of human exceptionalism—our cognition. However, the facts on the ground tell a story of consistent improvement. People are living longer, healthier lives with access to amenities that were luxuries a century ago. The anxiety we feel is a symptom of "too much change too fast," which threatens the social order. While the West is currently paralyzed by the fear of what might be lost, the East—specifically China—is embracing these tools because they have everything to gain. We are at a psychological crossroads: do we retreat into protectionism and fear, or do we recognize that our inherent strength lies in navigating these shifts intentionally? Decentralizing Power Through Personal Robotics and AI A common narrative suggests that AI will centralize power in a "trillionaire class," leaving the average person obsolete. Friedberg offers a counter-intuitive perspective rooted in the history of technology diffusion. When the internet began, critics feared Cisco Systems or Google would control all human interaction. Instead, technology commoditized. We are seeing this now with Large Language Models. Just recently, Andrejs Karpathy demonstrated that sophisticated AI agents can run on a home desktop, even improving themselves over a weekend without a hundred-billion-dollar data center. This is the shift from centralization to the "edge." In the physical realm, this manifests as personal robotics. Imagine a robot in your garage that works 24 hours a day. It doesn't belong to a corporation; it belongs to you. This robot can manufacture custom bicycles or fold laundry for a small business you run through Shopify. The "agency" that has been suppressed by a century of social programming—telling us to go to college to get a specific job to buy a specific house—is being handed back to the individual. Technology isn't just replacing the accountant; it's providing the tools for the accountant to become an orchestrator of multiple automated businesses. The barrier to entry for entrepreneurship is collapsing, shifting the burden of success from institutional permission to individual sovereignty. Establishing a Lunar Economy to Fuel Martian Colonization The conversation regarding space often fixates on Mars, but Friedberg argues the Moon is the essential industrial hub for that future. The physics of leaving Earth are brutal; the atmosphere and gravity require massive energy expenditures. The Moon, with one-sixth of Earth's gravity and no atmosphere, is the perfect shipyard. By manufacturing materials on the lunar surface, the energy cost to move that material to Mars drops by a factor of 100. The Moon is not a barren rock; it is a repository of aluminum, silicon, carbon, and water ice at the poles. With AI and self-replicating robotics, we can establish lunar factories that mine these materials and launch them via an electric "mass driver"—essentially a nine-kilometer rail gun. This system could propel a ton of material at 20,000 km/h toward Mars every hour, using only solar power and capacitors. We are on the verge of an "astropolitical" era where the first individuals or nations to plant a flag and establish defense systems on these resources will define the next industrial revolution. This isn't just a science fiction exercise; it is the expansion of a closed system (Earth) into an open, abundant economy where scarcity-driven wars might finally lose their logic. Reversing the Disease of Aging via Epigenetic Resetting Perhaps the most profound shift is the scientific reclassification of aging from a natural inevitability to a treatable disease. Every cell in the human body contains the same DNA, but what distinguishes an eye cell from a skin cell are "epigenetic" switches—ones and zeros that turn genes on or off. Over time, DNA damage from radiation, toxins, and metabolism causes these switches to drift. The wrong genes turn on, and the right ones turn off. This is the root of wrinkles, heart failure, and cognitive decline. In 2006, Shinya Yamanaka discovered four proteins—now called Yamanaka Factors—that can reset a cell to a stem-cell state. Subsequent research, championed by figures like David Sinclair, has shown that a "partial reset" can return an old cell to a youthful state without erasing its identity. In animal models, this has already reversed blindness and extended lifespans to the equivalent of 250 human years. We are currently in clinical trials for cocktails of these proteins. As we approach "longevity escape velocity," where every year lived adds more than a year to life expectancy, the implications for careers, family structures, and human potential are staggering. We are moving from a world where we "play around with fives and tens" of years to one where we maintain peak vitality indefinitely. The Ethical Minefield of Embryo Selection and Transgenics As we gain the ability to edit our own biology, the debate moves to the beginning of life. Embryo selection is already a reality. Doctors have long "eyeballed" embryos for viability, but companies like Heliospect (formerly associated with Johnny Anomaly) are now using genomic modeling to predict complex traits like IQ, immune function, and height. Friedberg notes that while people find this "icky," the Overton window shifts the moment it becomes a competitive game. If one group of parents uses these tools to ensure their children are resistant to depression or have higher cognitive potential, other parents will feel morally compelled to follow suit. Beyond selection lies CRISPR and "transgenics"—the introduction of genes that humans do not naturally possess. This could mean engineering humans who can see in infrared or who have bone densities suited for Martian gravity. While this sounds like the creation of "superheroes" or a dystopian caste system, it may be the only way for the human species to adapt to a world of Superintelligence. If the silicon models we build are a thousand times smarter than us, we face a choice: remain "fleshy boot loaders" for the AI, or use the AI as a rocket boost for our own biological evolution. The Economic Rot of the California Wealth Tax Contrasting this technological optimism is a grim socio-political reality in California. The state is currently facing a massive deficit, estimated between $600 billion and $1 trillion, largely due to unfunded pension liabilities and promises made to get politicians elected. To bridge this gap, a proposed "billionaire tax" seeks to implement a wealth tax—a levy on post-tax private property. Friedberg warns that this is a fundamental violation of the principles upon which the United States was founded. Unlike an income tax, a wealth tax requires the government to assess everything you own—your cars, your art, your private investments. It degrades private property rights and sets a precedent that the state can take a percentage of your net worth every year. History shows that what starts as a 1% tax on billionaires invariably expands to the middle class. This "socialism by increments" destroys the incentive for agency and risk-taking. We are in a bizarre juxtaposition: a world of infinite technological abundance being stifled by rotten social systems that prefer to divide a shrinking pie rather than grow a new one. The choice for the next decade is clear: do we embrace the agency offered by the future, or do we become slaves to a system that promises security but delivers only stagnation?