Adnan Khashoggi

Introduction: More Than Just a Black Book The recent release of millions of files related to Jeffrey Epstein has captivated global attention. The documents, forced into the light by a near-unanimous act of Congress, promise a glimpse into a sordid world of influence, corruption, and abuse. Yet, to focus solely on the names in Epstein's orbit is to miss the forest for the trees. This story is not just about one man's depravity; it is a keyhole view into a sprawling, decades-old architecture of power—a system where state intelligence, private finance, and criminal enterprises merge to conduct the business of geopolitics in the shadows. Epstein was not an anomaly. He was a feature, a product of a system that outsources its dirtiest work to a class of professional "fixers." These individuals operate in the gray space between government agencies and multinational corporations, building networks fueled by money, access, and secrets. To understand Epstein, we must first understand the world that created him. It is a world whose blueprints can be found in declassified documents from the JFK assassination, whose financial mechanisms were perfected in the Cold War, and whose modern form was forged in the crucible of the Iran-Contra affair. This is not a simple story of blackmail. It is the story of how covert operations are funded, how foreign policy is executed off-the-books, and how a parallel system of influence operates beyond the reach of conventional oversight. The Epstein saga is merely the latest chapter in a long history of privatized intelligence. The Anatomy of a Covert Operation: Lessons from the Archives To grasp the mechanics of the world Epstein inhabited, one must look past the immediate headlines and into the historical archives. The 2023 release of previously redacted JFK assassination files offers a perfect parallel. Most people sifted through them looking for a single smoking gun to solve a 60-year-old mystery. The real value, however, lies not in a single revelation but in the detailed illustration of the *structure* of intelligence work. These documents show us the playbook. They reveal a Central Intelligence Agency of the 1960s operating with minimal oversight, viewing assassination and sexual blackmail as standard tools of statecraft. One declassified file details, in sterile bureaucratic language, a plot to assassinate Fidel Castro by contracting hitmen from the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate. This was not a rogue operation; it was a formally documented agency plan. Another file describes the creation of a pornographic film designed to simulate an affair involving the president of Indonesia. The goal was to create a sexual blackmail tape to discredit a foreign leader. These were the tactics considered acceptable in the service of national security. The operations, known as Operation Mongoose and Operation Condor, aimed to destabilize communist-leaning governments throughout Latin America. They represent a foundational period where the lines between intelligence gathering and criminal activity were deliberately erased. This history provides essential context; the methods associated with Jeffrey Epstein—using sex as a tool of influence and leverage—were not his invention. They were a refinement of a well-established intelligence agency model. The Overworld and the Underworld: A Necessary Alliance A persistent theme in the history of covert operations is the pragmatic, if unsettling, alliance between the "overworld" of government and the "underworld" of organized crime. This partnership is not born of shared values but of mutual necessity. Intelligence operations, at their core, are often criminal acts: sabotage, subversion, illegal surveillance. To execute these tasks without leaving official fingerprints, agencies turn to those who commit crimes for a living. This relationship predates the CIA itself. During World War II, the U.S. Department of War worked with the Italian mafia to undermine Benito Mussolini, who was cracking down on both the Vatican and the mob. This created a powerful tripartite alliance, explored in detail in books like *Operation Gladio*. The structure was simple: the U.S. government provided protection, the mob provided logistical muscle—controlling ports, streets, and safe houses—and the Vatican Bank provided the financial secrecy. The Vatican Bank was, in effect, the world's first modern offshore bank. As a sovereign entity, it was exempt from the transparency rules of Italy and the European Union, making it the perfect vehicle for laundering money to fund black operations. This very mechanism was highlighted in a recently revealed email from Larry Summers, former Treasury Secretary and Harvard President, to Jeffrey Epstein. Summers explained that the real power struggle in the Vatican was not over the Pope's retirement, but over the leadership of its bank, the Institute for Works of Religion, precisely because of its financial opacity. This model—a state-sponsored criminal syndicate with an untouchable bank—became the template for financing covert actions throughout the Cold War. It demonstrates that the nexus of intelligence, crime, and opaque finance is not a conspiracy theory but a documented strategy of statecraft. The Rise of the Private Network: From Iran-Contra to "The Enterprise" The modern era of privatized intelligence began in the mid-1970s. The Church Committee hearings exposed a generation of CIA abuses to a shocked American public, from domestic spying (Operation CHAOS) to mind-control experiments (MKUltra). In response, Congress placed significant handcuffs on the agency, creating permanent oversight committees and slashing its operational budget. This created a problem for stakeholders in the national security state who believed such dirty work was still necessary. If the CIA could no longer do it legally, the work had to be moved off-the-books. This led to the creation of the Safari Club in 1976, an informal, private intelligence-sharing alliance between the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the UK, and pre-revolution Iran. It was hosted by Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and operated outside the bounds of U.S. law, effectively privatizing covert action. This model reached its zenith during the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s. The Reagan administration faced two major obstacles. First, an international arms embargo prevented them from legally arming Iran in its war against Iraq. Second, the Boland Amendment, passed by a Democrat-controlled House, forbade using U.S. government funds to support the Contra rebels fighting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. To circumvent both laws, CIA Director William Casey developed what he called "The Enterprise": a fully private, self-sustaining, off-the-shelf entity. It was a standalone intelligence apparatus that could conduct foreign policy without official sanction or taxpayer money. Its funding came from private donors and, most notoriously, from the black market trade of narcotics. The Enterprise used a CIA proprietary airline, Southern Air Transport, to run a guns-for-cash-for-drugs operation. Cocaine from Latin America funded the Contras, while profits from arms sales to Iran were funneled through the same networks. This affair cemented the blueprint for modern covert action, proving that a completely privatized network could execute state policy while offering plausible deniability. Jeffrey Epstein: A Case Study in Modern Statecraft Jeffrey Epstein was not merely a predator; he was a quintessential operator within this privatized system. His career began in 1976 at Bear Stearns, the very year the Safari Club was formed and the CIA was being forced into the shadows. His rise was meteoric, aided by his relationship with the daughter of CEO Ace Greenberg. But his value came from his placement at the center of the era's most significant covert financial operation: the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI, known as the "Bank of Crooks and Criminals International," was the CIA's primary vehicle for laundering money to fund the Mujahideen in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union. This was the same operation where National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski famously told Afghan fighters, "God is on your side." To fund this holy war, the CIA and its partners cultivated opium in the Golden Crescent, and BCCI washed the drug money. Bear Stearns was one of BCCI's three biggest clearing houses in the U.S., processing billions in transactions. Epstein, the firm's rising star, was right in the middle of it. When Epstein left Bear Stearns in 1981, he took the clients and the playbook with him. His first major client was Adnan Khashoggi, the Saudi arms dealer at the heart of both the Safari Club and Iran-Contra. Epstein was now handling the private finances of the central middleman in the CIA's largest covert operations. His possession of a fake Austrian passport listing his residence as Saudi Arabia, discovered only after his death, speaks to his deep integration into this network. Epstein specialized in what the system required: moving money for powerful people without leaving a trail, connecting private capital with geopolitical objectives. Within this framework, the sexual component of his network appears as a tool of the trade. Rather than direct blackmail—a risky tactic that could destroy his access overnight—the parties and the young women served as a powerful lubricant for deal-making. They provided a currency of access and pleasure that made powerful people want to stay in his orbit. In a world of billionaires, access to unique social experiences and vices is a potent form of leverage. It "juiced the deals," ensuring that when a favor was needed—whether for an intelligence service or a corporate partner—his network would deliver, not out of fear, but out of a desire to remain part of his exclusive world. The Modern Manifestations: From Drug Wars to Climate Finance The model perfected during Iran-Contra and utilized by Epstein continues to shape global events. The mechanisms of plausible deniability and private financing are simply applied to new geopolitical priorities. The Obama-era "Fast and Furious" scandal was a direct echo of the past. U.S. government agencies, including the ATF and DOJ, facilitated the running of thousands of guns to the Sinaloa cartel to help it win a narco-war against the rival Los Zetas cartel, which was threatening U.S.-aligned oil interests in Mexico. Once again, the government armed a favored faction in a foreign conflict, using criminal networks to achieve a policy objective. A more recent and controversial application of this model lies in the realm of climate finance. The initial, aggressive push for green energy policies in the mid-2000s coincided directly with a resurgent Russia under Vladimir Putin, who was using his country's vast hydrocarbon reserves to reassert influence over Eastern Europe. De-legitimizing oil and gas was a potent geopolitical weapon to kneecap the Russian economy. As government subsidies, mandates, and tax incentives poured into the green energy sector, it created a gold rush for investors. Today, this has evolved into a multi-trillion-dollar financial-political complex with a life of its own. It has become a powerful driver of foreign policy, where regime change operations appear to align with the financial interests of climate-focused hedge funds. The U.S.-backed political turmoil in Brazil, which saw the ouster of Jair Bolsonaro, was followed by the new government announcing a massive climate finance initiative, benefiting investors in clean ethanol and other green technologies. This fusion of geopolitical strategy, intelligence operations, and private finance has created a self-perpetuating system where policy goals and profit motives are indistinguishable. Implications and the Path to Transparency The enduring legacy of this system is a shadow government operating beyond public accountability. The lines between national security, corporate enrichment, and criminal enterprise have been so thoroughly blurred that it is often impossible to tell them apart. When the Justice Department prosecutes cases, it must navigate a minefield of classified operations. The declassified memo regarding the 1960s prosecution of Cuban exile leader Rolando Masferrer is a stunning blueprint for this process. In it, the CIA warns the DOJ of the "massive damage" a full prosecution would cause by exposing its networks. The result was a negotiated, limited prosecution designed to protect the agency's secrets—a scenario that has played out time and again, including in Epstein's own sweetheart plea deal in 2008. This is the core of the problem. Epstein's activities, from financial fraud to sex trafficking, went unpunished for decades not just because of wealthy connections, but because his network was entangled with powerful state and foreign intelligence interests. A full, transparent prosecution threatened to pull threads that could unravel entire covert operations. We now have a historic opportunity for clarity. The files released so far originated with the DOJ and FBI. The most critical documents—those held by the CIA—remain classified. In 1999 and again in 2011, Jeffrey Epstein himself filed Freedom of Information Act requests with the CIA for its records on him. The agency's response was a classic "Glomar" denial: it could neither confirm nor deny the existence of classified records. This alone is a bombshell, suggesting the agency has files it cannot acknowledge. The path forward is clear. In 1992, Congress passed the JFK Records Collection Act, which forced the CIA to declassify hundreds of thousands of documents related to the assassination. A similar "Jeffrey Epstein Records Collection Act" is now essential. Such a bill would compel the CIA to submit its files to an independent review board for declassification. Only then can we begin to assemble the solid, verifiable pieces needed to truly understand the architecture of this shadow world. Without this transparency, we are left to argue over shadows, while the system that created Epstein continues to operate, unseen and untouched.