The Myth of Artificial General Intelligence Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI, exists more as a marketing vehicle than a scientific destination. The term serves as a convenient container that OpenAI and its peers redefine based on their immediate audience. When Sam Altman speaks to Congress, he frames AGI as a humanitarian miracle capable of curing cancer and solving climate change. When the same executive speaks to investors at Microsoft, the definition shifts to a system capable of generating hundreds of billions in revenue. On the company's website, it is defined as autonomous systems that outperform humans in economically valuable work. This lack of a coherent, scientific definition allows these companies to move goalposts at will, using the promise of a "god-like" technology to ward off regulation and extract astronomical amounts of capital. The historical roots of the field reveal this ambiguity was baked in from the start. In 1956, when John McCarthy coined the term at Dartmouth University, his colleagues expressed concern that the name pegged the discipline to recreating human intelligence—a concept for which there is still no biological or psychological consensus. Every historical attempt to quantify and rank human intelligence has been driven by nefarious motives, often aiming to prove the inferiority of certain groups. By chasing a goalpost that doesn't exist, the AI industry has created a religious-like mythos that requires the public to seed power to a handful of self-appointed guardians. Internal Power Struggles and the Firing of Sam Altman The internal culture of OpenAI has been far from the harmonious mission-driven environment portrayed in press releases. The dramatic firing of Sam Altman by the board was the culmination of long-standing concerns regarding his leadership style and transparency. Ilya Sutskever, the company's chief scientist, became increasingly alarmed by what he saw as a chaotic environment where teams were pitted against one another and information was selectively shared. These were not merely management gripes; in a company that believes it is building a technology capable of destroying humanity, instability is viewed as an existential threat. Ilya Sutskever and Mira Murati eventually approached independent board members like Helen Toner and Adam D'Angelo with documentation of Sam Altman's behavior. They argued that the problem could not be fixed unless he was removed. One specific point of contention involved the OpenAI Startup Fund. The board discovered that despite the name, the fund was legally owned by Sam Altman personally, a detail that exacerbated the lack of trust. When the board finally moved to fire him, they did so in secret, fearing his persuasive abilities would derail the process if he caught wind of it. This secrecy backfired, leading to a massive employee revolt fueled by Microsoft and other stakeholders who were left out of the decision, ultimately resulting in his reinstatement and the departure of his critics. The Imperial Structure of Modern Tech The metaphor of empire is the only framework that fully captures how modern AI companies operate. Like the empires of old, they lay claim to resources that are not their own—in this case, the intellectual property of artists, writers, and every person who has ever posted on the open internet. They engage in a global land grab for supercomputer facilities, often choosing vulnerable communities to host these resource-intensive hubs. They also monopolize knowledge production, bankrolling the majority of the world's AI researchers to ensure that only convenient truths are published. When researchers like Timnit Gebru find inconvenient evidence of harm, they are swiftly silenced or terminated. This imperial agenda is justified by a narrative of "the good empire" versus "the bad empire." OpenAI and its peers argue that they must be allowed to extract data and exploit labor because if they don't do it first, an evil actor—usually China or a profit-driven Google—will win the race. This creates a false dichotomy that forces the public to accept a deeply anti-democratic approach to development. If we believe we are in a civilizational arms race, we are less likely to question the environmental cost of a data center or the ethics of mass data scraping. This narrative is a tool used to consolidate power in the hands of a few billionaires who believe they alone should have their "finger on the button." Labor Exploitation and the Data Annotation Underclass While the industry markets AI as a tool that will liberate humans from drudgery, the reality for a growing number of workers is the exact opposite. AI is not a self-learning machine; it is a system that requires millions of hours of human labor to function. This labor comes from a global underclass of data annotators who painstakingly label images, text, and video to teach the models. As Sebastian Siemiatkowski of Klarna notes, companies are aggressively downsizing their human workforce in favor of these models. However, the people being laid off—including highly educated professionals and creative directors—are often finding themselves forced into the very data annotation jobs that are automating their previous careers. This work is often precarious and inhumane. Third-party firms pit workers against each other in a race to the bottom, requiring them to stay glued to their screens for pings that signal a new project. This "mechanization" of human life erodes dignity and removes any semblance of a career ladder. There are no rungs to climb when entry-level and mid-tier roles are gouged out by automation, leaving only high-level orchestrators and a vast, invisible workforce of annotators. The industry is not making us more human; it is atomizing work and devaluing expertise to serve a machine that executives claim will eventually make everyone redundant. This is a political choice, not a technological inevitability. Environmental Racism and the Physical Cost of AI The physical infrastructure required to sustain the "cloud" is exacting a devastating toll on public health and the environment. Data centers are not ethereal; they are massive industrial facilities that consume gigawatts of power and millions of gallons of fresh water. These facilities are frequently built in working-class or minority communities that are not given a say in their construction. In Memphis, Tennessee, Elon Musk built the Colossus supercomputer using dozens of methane gas turbines. Residents only discovered the facility's existence when they began to smell gas in their homes and experienced exacerbated respiratory issues. These communities face a double burden: they are displaced by the technology's economic impacts while their local resources are drained to power it. In regions facing droughts, data centers compete with residents for water to cool their servers. The utility bills for the local population often rise to cover the infrastructure needed for these industrial giants. This is environmental racism in its modern form—extracting the health and resources of the vulnerable to fuel the "abundance" promised to the global elite. The disparity between those who benefit from AI and those who pay for its production is widening into a chasm. Breaking Up the Empire through Alternatives The current path of "brute-force" scaling is not the only way to develop artificial intelligence. We have historically seen that specialized models, like AlphaFold by DeepMind, can provide extraordinary scientific benefits without requiring the entire internet as a training set. These are the "bicycles of AI"—efficient, targeted, and useful tools that don't require the resource consumption of a rocket. By focusing on curated data and specific utility, we can preserve the benefits of the technology while stripping away the imperial baggage of mass extraction and exploitation. Breaking up the AI empires requires a reassertion of democratic agency. This includes supporting the 80% of Americans who want to regulate the industry and backing the grassroots movements protesting data center expansion. Artists and writers suing for IP protection are not just protecting their paychecks; they are withholding the "fuel" that the empire needs to perpetuate itself. We must stop viewing AI development as a flawless, inevitable progression and start viewing it as a series of choices that can be contested. If we do not agree with the world these companies are building, we have the right and the responsibility to make its construction as difficult as possible until they agree to a fair exchange of value. Summary of the Future Outlook The AI industry stands at a crossroads between imperial domination and democratic integration. While Sam Altman and other leaders project a future of post-labor abundance, the current trajectory points toward heightened inequality and environmental degradation. The "race" against China is frequently used as a shield to bypass ethical scrutiny, but the real contest is between the public interest and private power. As social media usage plateaus and younger generations seek more "IRL" connections, there is a growing appetite for a world that prioritizes human flourishing over machine efficiency. Whether AI becomes a tool for collective progress or a mechanism for global extraction depends entirely on our willingness to dismantle the myths and demand a more humane path forward.
Organizations
- Mar 26, 2026
- Dec 1, 2025
- Oct 21, 2025
- Mar 11, 2024
- Jun 13, 2022
The False Dichotomy of Logic and Wonder Many of us live with a constant internal friction. On one side, we value the cold, hard facts of the material world. We appreciate Google engineers for their technical brilliance and we rely on scientific data to inform our health and technology. On the other side, we feel an undeniable tug toward something deeper—a sense of awe when looking at the stars or a profound intuition that tells us to cross the street before we even see a threat. Often, we feel forced to choose between being a rational, thinking person and being a 'spiritual' person. This tension creates a split in the psyche. We see it in high-performers who mock religion but find themselves weeping with a sense of cosmic oneness during a weekend at Burning%20Man. This isn't a contradiction; it is a symptom of a human need that cannot be met by data alone. Spirituality isn't about escaping reality or embracing 'spooky' superstitions. It is about the depth of life. It is the animating energy that has been moving the universe forward for 13 billion years. When we acknowledge this, we stop trying to reduce our existence to mere synapses and start living as integrated beings. Moving Beyond Reductionism to Authentic Depth Modern intellectual traditions often prize one way of knowing—the cerebral—over all others. We become so smart that we lose the ability to maintain a relationship or find joy in the present. This is the 'upper bound' of utilitarianism. If you are so smart, why aren't you happy? The answer often lies in reductionism. When we reduce a feeling of heartbreak to a chemical wash of cortisol, we haven't actually explained the experience; we have only described the plumbing. True growth requires a trans-rational approach. This isn't irrationality; it is an evolution that keeps the logical mind fully engaged while allowing for other ways of knowing. Think of Rob%20Bell, who transitioned from the rigid structures of a traditional Mega%20Church to a more fluid, artistic exploration of faith. He discovered that the institution often demands stability, while the soul demands evolution. To be fully alive, you must permit yourself to grow, even if that growth makes the people around you uncomfortable. You are not a static product; you are an ongoing process of discovery. The Wisdom of the Body and the Heart We often treat our brains as the sole command center, but the body carries a sophisticated intelligence of its own. Consider the 'gut instinct.' This isn't magic; it is a bizarre aggregate of subconscious experiences and accrued wisdom that your prefrontal cortex hasn't yet put into words. When you feel your internal organs drop upon receiving a 'we need to talk' text, you are experiencing a reality that is both biological and phenomenological. In coaching sessions, I often ask people to 'sink down from the head into the heart.' The head is full of chatter, self-doubt, and the voices of experts telling you how things 'should' be done. The heart, however, often holds a striking clarity. When we drop the analytical shield, we find that we already know the next step. It is usually straightforward, but we have argued ourselves out of it because it doesn't fit the 'rational' script we were handed by mentors or parents. Trusting this internal clarity is a vital practice for resilience. Practicing the Art of Allowing Our modern world is obsessed with mastery, hustle, and domination. We are taught that the answer to every problem is to 'do more' or 'try harder.' However, true transformation often comes from a different posture: allowing. This is the act of letting go of the 'reductionist funnel' that limits our perception. Our brains are wired to filter out 99% of reality just so we can function, but this shortcut causes us to live through mental models rather than actual experience. To allow is to open your peripherals. It is to look at the trees on the street you’ve walked a thousand times and actually see the vibrance of the color, rather than just the 'tree' label your brain assigned to it five years ago. This shift from 'making it happen' to 'becoming aware of what is already happening' reduces the energy required to live and increases the wonder available to us. It is the difference between burning a candle at both ends and simply being the light. The Power of the Present Moment Every great wisdom tradition, from Buddhism to the Old%20Testament, eventually points to the same truth: the only place you can ever be is here, now. We spend our lives haunted by the past—where regret lives—or anxious about the future—where worry lives. This is an immense waste of cognitive energy. Bell’s personal experience with a closed-head injury serves as a powerful metaphor. When his brain temporarily lost the ability to process the past or the future, he was forced into a state of pure presence. He met his children as if for the first time, seeing them with cellular recognition but without the baggage of history. While we don't wish for injury, we can cultivate this 'beginner's mind' through mindfulness. We can recognize that we have made it through every fear we have ever had. You are here. You are breathing. That simplicity isn't a retreat from the world; it is the ultimate foundation for navigating it with strength and joy. Building Your Own Integrated Path You do not need to wear dreadlocks or join a monastery to be spiritual. You simply need to stop ignoring the parts of your experience that data cannot quantify. Whether you find your 'oneness' through Quantum%20Physics, poetry, or regenerative farming, the goal is the same: to be fully human. Stop trying to be the same person you were yesterday. Embrace the 'intellectual restlessness' that drives you to ask the big questions. If an organization, a job, or a belief system no longer serves your growth, you are not obligated to bring it with you. Your life is an art experiment. The greatest gift you can give yourself is the permission to evolve, to listen to your heart, and to stand in awe of the fact that you are here, hurtling through space, participating in this wondrous, strange experience.
Nov 14, 2020The Internal Architecture of Success Most of us spend our lives chasing achievement without ever stopping to define what success actually looks like on our own terms. We are often caught in a reactive cycle, responding to the demands of our careers, families, and social circles while our true potential remains dormant. Real growth—what Robert Glazer calls "elevation"—isn't about hitting someone else’s benchmarks. It is about closing the gap between who you are today and who you are capable of becoming. This process requires a shift from accidental living to intentional capacity building. Capacity building is the method by which we expand our ability to perform, lead, and thrive across all areas of life. It’s a holistic framework that prevents the common tragedy of winning the wrong game. We’ve all heard stories of the executive who reaches the pinnacle of their industry only to realize they haven't spoken to their children in years. They focused on speed but ignored direction. To avoid this, we must build strength in four distinct but interconnected areas: spiritual, intellectual, physical, and emotional. When these four pillars are aligned, you don't just achieve more; you become more. Spiritual Capacity: Finding Your Personal Compass In the business world, the word "spiritual" often makes people uncomfortable. However, in this framework, it has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with identity. Robert Glazer defines spiritual capacity as the ability to understand who you are and what you want most. It is the rudder of your boat. Without it, you might have a magnificent, fast-moving vessel, but you could be sailing toward Antarctica when you actually want to be in Hawaii. Building spiritual capacity starts with identifying your personal core values. These are the non-negotiable principles that guide your behavior and decision-making. Most people only realize their core values have been crossed when they feel a deep sense of friction or resentment in a job or relationship. By turning the lights on in that metaphorical tunnel, you can see the walls before you hit them. Whether it’s "health and vitality" or "respectful authenticity," knowing your values allows you to set goals that actually fulfill you. As Greg McKeown points out in Essentialism, if you don't prioritize your life, someone else will. Spiritual capacity ensures that your "why" is the driving force behind every "what." Intellectual Capacity: Upgrading Your Operating System Once you know your destination, you need a system to get there. This is your intellectual capacity—the operating system of your life. It involves how you think, learn, plan, and execute with discipline. Many people confuse intellectual growth with working harder or "hacking" their way to success. But a true upgrade to your processor means you can crunch more data with less energy. It’s about efficiency and discipline, not just volume. This pillar encompasses your habits, your routines, and your commitment to lifelong learning. It is the difference between an amateur and a pro. Think about a professional athlete: they don't just show up for the game; they optimize their food, their rest, and their practice hours. Most people in the business world are far from this level of preparation. To expand this capacity, you must embrace accountability. Robert Glazer suggests a three-tier approach: self-accountability through journaling, peer accountability through mastermind groups, and public accountability by stating your goals to the world. When you improve your ability to focus and solve problems, tasks that once felt like a mountain become manageable steps. Physical Capacity: The Foundation of Resilience Physical capacity is the most visible pillar, yet it is often the first one we sacrifice when life gets busy. It’s not just about looking good in the mirror; it’s about the energy and stamina required to show up for your values and your goals. If you are constantly tired, stressed, and run down, your intellectual and emotional capacities will inevitably suffer. You cannot lead effectively or think clearly if your body is in a state of chronic neglect. Resilience lives at the intersection of the physical and the emotional. It is built by doing hard things that you didn't think you could do. Whether it’s an olympic triathlon or a consistent morning walk, pushing your physical boundaries provides evidence of your own strength. This pillar also requires managing the silent energy killer: stress. Stress is not an external force; it is an internal physiological response. When a crisis hits—like a merger falling through or a car accident—your body releases cortisol. If you don't have a physical "relief valve" like exercise or deep breathing, that stress stays trapped in your system, clouding your judgment. Taking care of your body isn't a luxury; it's the prerequisite for high performance. Emotional Capacity: Navigating the External World Emotional capacity is perhaps the most challenging pillar because it involves everything we cannot control. It is about how you react to challenging situations and the quality of your relationships. A key component here is the
Oct 24, 2020