Political Correctness
functions as more than a social etiquette; it operates as a systematic re-engineering of the human experience. By redefining terms, proponents of this shift aim to transform reality itself. This creates a strategic impasse where traditionalists find themselves caught in a cycle of reactive compliance or total standard-stripping. When we change the words we use to describe the world, we inevitably change how we perceive our place within it.
The Paradox of Absolute Neutrality
Many seek refuge in the idea of being a Free Speech
absolutist. However, abandoning all standards in the name of total liberty often results in the same outcome as total compliance: the destruction of the old order. If no standards are defended, none remain. This vacuum allows radical ideologies to thrive. True resilience requires standing for a substantive vision of the world rather than just the right to say anything at any time.
The Psychology of Liberty and Will
Human nature involves a constant struggle between the lower will—our base appetites—and the rational higher will. St. Paul
famously captured this internal conflict, noting the gap between our intentions and our actions. Modern movements often conflate freedom with the ability to satisfy every lower impulse. Yet, a man enslaved to his passions is not free. Authentic liberty requires the mediation of reason and an adherence to Objective Truth
.
Reclaiming Tradition and Order
Society is more than a collection of individuals seeking autonomy; it is a political body connected by shared meanings. When we lose our relationship to reality through semantic games, we lose the culture itself. Defending tradition is not about being uncharitable; it is about protecting the structures that make human flourishing possible. Without a return to these foundational standards, the momentum of radical liberation will continue to detach society from the natural world.
